jakenney.bsky.social
@jakenney.bsky.social
Reposted
Nervous Musk, Trump, Vance have all been outclassed in public arguments these last few days. Government failure, stock market crash, and dictatorial alliances are not popular. People are starting to realize that there is no truth here beyond the desire for personal wealth and power. (2/2)
February 22, 2025 at 2:06 PM
Reposted
Stephen. Remind people that they’re not helpless
February 14, 2025 at 1:35 AM
Reposted
I invite lawyers to comment on the part of the TRO that requires SGEs to destroy copies they've already made of info they've accessed. The SGEs aren't parties to the suit, unless they're encompassed in "President Trump" ...
/7
February 8, 2025 at 1:25 PM
Reposted
Court has criminal contempt powers. He can throw people in jail, including treasury and OMB director.
February 8, 2025 at 1:11 PM
Reposted
Given the amount of personal data exposed/stolen and the unconstitutional manner in which it was taken, are there grounds for a class action suit? Damage against individual citizens, financial institutions? Thank you.
February 8, 2025 at 12:54 PM
Reposted
Judge Engelmayer accepted the AG's argument below, pending full briefing, that letting politically appted SGEs access this material, formerly managed by "a limited number of career civil servants" poses "huge cybersecurity risks" & danger that their residents' sensitive PII will be "compromised."
/6
February 8, 2025 at 1:15 PM
Reposted
Giving access to SSNs, other data on government employees to non-employees like Musk is a violation of 5 USC 552a, and carries with it a penalty of $1000 per person whose data was accessed. We are building a case. Govt employees who want to participate should contact me directly
February 3, 2025 at 1:18 PM