@iznogoodbd.bsky.social
U probably know a lot more about this issue than me.
However, If I may… .
It seems to me that you consider this « institution » : the State(s)as a person. Why ?
And IT(!) kills (real!)people!
So why don’t we get rid of the State(s), please ?
Fetichism? Sadomasochism? Victims of violence and Utopia?
However, If I may… .
It seems to me that you consider this « institution » : the State(s)as a person. Why ?
And IT(!) kills (real!)people!
So why don’t we get rid of the State(s), please ?
Fetichism? Sadomasochism? Victims of violence and Utopia?
December 20, 2025 at 3:31 PM
U probably know a lot more about this issue than me.
However, If I may… .
It seems to me that you consider this « institution » : the State(s)as a person. Why ?
And IT(!) kills (real!)people!
So why don’t we get rid of the State(s), please ?
Fetichism? Sadomasochism? Victims of violence and Utopia?
However, If I may… .
It seems to me that you consider this « institution » : the State(s)as a person. Why ?
And IT(!) kills (real!)people!
So why don’t we get rid of the State(s), please ?
Fetichism? Sadomasochism? Victims of violence and Utopia?
I beg ur pardon. Are there debates regarding "decolonisation" please? I mean other perspectives that enable to grasp what "decolonisation" could mean/be?From my point of view it means being able to think of a "Society" OUTSIDE "Empire/(Nation-)State/Market economies".
December 18, 2025 at 10:28 AM
I beg ur pardon. Are there debates regarding "decolonisation" please? I mean other perspectives that enable to grasp what "decolonisation" could mean/be?From my point of view it means being able to think of a "Society" OUTSIDE "Empire/(Nation-)State/Market economies".
In your "business model", "money/donations" supports Imagination. Why not using "First Nations" understandings of "money" to reverse your business model : Imagination that supports money, instead? THAT would be FUN.
December 17, 2025 at 7:54 PM
In your "business model", "money/donations" supports Imagination. Why not using "First Nations" understandings of "money" to reverse your business model : Imagination that supports money, instead? THAT would be FUN.
It's about supporting creativeness, right? Through "donations", "money"? Well, in fact, it's the other way around... : Imagination SUPPORTS money!
Can I suggest (fun)readings please? By scholars?
Can I suggest (fun)readings please? By scholars?
December 17, 2025 at 7:38 PM
It's about supporting creativeness, right? Through "donations", "money"? Well, in fact, it's the other way around... : Imagination SUPPORTS money!
Can I suggest (fun)readings please? By scholars?
Can I suggest (fun)readings please? By scholars?
Interesting really. But why not:"What creates new social forms?" instead? Ain't "Society" a myth?
December 15, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Interesting really. But why not:"What creates new social forms?" instead? Ain't "Society" a myth?
Is it really accurate to be "talkin'bout revolution" here? It ain't one for me. (Depressing) Lack of IMAGINATION.
December 15, 2025 at 9:35 AM
Is it really accurate to be "talkin'bout revolution" here? It ain't one for me. (Depressing) Lack of IMAGINATION.
I've heard of it, but I'm not sure to really understand what happened.
You are?
Sûre, je veux dire. Sauriez-vous, par hasard, si des universitaires-critiques, ont pris la parole? Les derniers articles que j'ai consultés n'augurent rien de bon. (A MON TRES HUMBLE AVIS!)
You are?
Sûre, je veux dire. Sauriez-vous, par hasard, si des universitaires-critiques, ont pris la parole? Les derniers articles que j'ai consultés n'augurent rien de bon. (A MON TRES HUMBLE AVIS!)
December 14, 2025 at 10:05 AM
I've heard of it, but I'm not sure to really understand what happened.
You are?
Sûre, je veux dire. Sauriez-vous, par hasard, si des universitaires-critiques, ont pris la parole? Les derniers articles que j'ai consultés n'augurent rien de bon. (A MON TRES HUMBLE AVIS!)
You are?
Sûre, je veux dire. Sauriez-vous, par hasard, si des universitaires-critiques, ont pris la parole? Les derniers articles que j'ai consultés n'augurent rien de bon. (A MON TRES HUMBLE AVIS!)
Well, according to your posts history, should I say: " Yay! You've made it at last!" ?
October 17, 2025 at 2:29 PM
Well, according to your posts history, should I say: " Yay! You've made it at last!" ?
The « show » is about (the assault on)social ties… . And ALL the people who have come will be kept away from the discussion… ???
(For real ???!!!)
(For real ???!!!)
September 7, 2025 at 11:28 AM
The « show » is about (the assault on)social ties… . And ALL the people who have come will be kept away from the discussion… ???
(For real ???!!!)
(For real ???!!!)
After viewing the first 6 minutes (and a bit more)... of the « show (?) », one question- among many (really many !) others, stands out from the crowd : « They're not going to include the audience in the discussion » ?
September 7, 2025 at 11:27 AM
After viewing the first 6 minutes (and a bit more)... of the « show (?) », one question- among many (really many !) others, stands out from the crowd : « They're not going to include the audience in the discussion » ?
Are u implying that you regret that the « resistance and protest » ONLY lasted for one night ?
That, would be an act of resistance and protest as well.
That, would be an act of resistance and protest as well.
August 29, 2025 at 7:21 AM
Are u implying that you regret that the « resistance and protest » ONLY lasted for one night ?
That, would be an act of resistance and protest as well.
That, would be an act of resistance and protest as well.
Beg ur pardon plz. Is the Nation-Stae/Empire in or out of your focus ?
Would u consider d following ?
Ch8 of d book below starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
Would u consider d following ?
Ch8 of d book below starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
August 29, 2025 at 6:55 AM
Beg ur pardon plz. Is the Nation-Stae/Empire in or out of your focus ?
Would u consider d following ?
Ch8 of d book below starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
Would u consider d following ?
Ch8 of d book below starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
Would u agree to debate (gently) about that plz?
To begin , would u read Ch4 of the book below on ur left plz?
After, regarding debt as a means of enslavement, perhaps the book below on ur right? Ch6 only?
To begin , would u read Ch4 of the book below on ur left plz?
After, regarding debt as a means of enslavement, perhaps the book below on ur right? Ch6 only?
August 21, 2025 at 8:05 PM
Would u agree to debate (gently) about that plz?
To begin , would u read Ch4 of the book below on ur left plz?
After, regarding debt as a means of enslavement, perhaps the book below on ur right? Ch6 only?
To begin , would u read Ch4 of the book below on ur left plz?
After, regarding debt as a means of enslavement, perhaps the book below on ur right? Ch6 only?
WHY ? Why do the « remittances play a big role in Pacific economies » ? Min09:40s to 10:00 .
May I suggest a book for a trip back in time. The English Financial Revolution.
Carl Wennerlind : « Casualties of Credit » ?
May I suggest a book for a trip back in time. The English Financial Revolution.
Carl Wennerlind : « Casualties of Credit » ?
August 19, 2025 at 8:01 PM
WHY ? Why do the « remittances play a big role in Pacific economies » ? Min09:40s to 10:00 .
May I suggest a book for a trip back in time. The English Financial Revolution.
Carl Wennerlind : « Casualties of Credit » ?
May I suggest a book for a trip back in time. The English Financial Revolution.
Carl Wennerlind : « Casualties of Credit » ?
Negatively(a bit), cuz u ignore(or seem to) the subprime crisis. Ann Pettifor, Steve Keen, Michaël Hudson… .
« Instead, public finance is seen as being dependent on the ‘wealth-creating’ private sector, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of how states are funded ». p.12.
« Instead, public finance is seen as being dependent on the ‘wealth-creating’ private sector, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of how states are funded ». p.12.
August 19, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Negatively(a bit), cuz u ignore(or seem to) the subprime crisis. Ann Pettifor, Steve Keen, Michaël Hudson… .
« Instead, public finance is seen as being dependent on the ‘wealth-creating’ private sector, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of how states are funded ». p.12.
« Instead, public finance is seen as being dependent on the ‘wealth-creating’ private sector, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of how states are funded ». p.12.
It IS also exceptional(!) that a journalist(chic as well AND open-minded !) accepts to tag along a critical interpretation !
August 19, 2025 at 7:58 PM
It IS also exceptional(!) that a journalist(chic as well AND open-minded !) accepts to tag along a critical interpretation !
Your speech was sparkling, chic, passionate, critical… .
I am truly amazed.
Positively and a bit negatively.
Positively because, again, you are a passionate scholar aiming for a critical interpretation.
That’s rare.
I am truly amazed.
Positively and a bit negatively.
Positively because, again, you are a passionate scholar aiming for a critical interpretation.
That’s rare.
August 19, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Your speech was sparkling, chic, passionate, critical… .
I am truly amazed.
Positively and a bit negatively.
Positively because, again, you are a passionate scholar aiming for a critical interpretation.
That’s rare.
I am truly amazed.
Positively and a bit negatively.
Positively because, again, you are a passionate scholar aiming for a critical interpretation.
That’s rare.
Right. Queen Elizabeth also had no idea why the subprime crisis happened. So she asked. To the top economists from the London school of economics. They too had no idea... .
August 18, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Right. Queen Elizabeth also had no idea why the subprime crisis happened. So she asked. To the top economists from the London school of economics. They too had no idea... .
« Instead, public finance is seen as being dependent on the ‘wealth-creating’ private sector, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of how states are funded ». These lines are from the book of Mary MELLOR : « MONEY- Myths, Truths and alternatives », p.12.
August 18, 2025 at 2:45 PM
« Instead, public finance is seen as being dependent on the ‘wealth-creating’ private sector, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of how states are funded ». These lines are from the book of Mary MELLOR : « MONEY- Myths, Truths and alternatives », p.12.
Beg ur pardon.
The story IS fascinating indeed.
However from my point of view, there’s more to it because of : « (...)Dorji-Wangchuck asked Todd to help Bhutan raise a $10m loan from the World Bank ».
Why ???
The story IS fascinating indeed.
However from my point of view, there’s more to it because of : « (...)Dorji-Wangchuck asked Todd to help Bhutan raise a $10m loan from the World Bank ».
Why ???
August 18, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Beg ur pardon.
The story IS fascinating indeed.
However from my point of view, there’s more to it because of : « (...)Dorji-Wangchuck asked Todd to help Bhutan raise a $10m loan from the World Bank ».
Why ???
The story IS fascinating indeed.
However from my point of view, there’s more to it because of : « (...)Dorji-Wangchuck asked Todd to help Bhutan raise a $10m loan from the World Bank ».
Why ???
Well noted. Thanks.
August 15, 2025 at 7:59 PM
Well noted. Thanks.
My bad. Sorry. Let's try with Carl Wennerlind:"Casualties of Credit -The English Financial revolution". Plz stop reading Dr
GRAEBER,for the time being.
It's about the "background" as an illusion/utopia.
You, going to buy a book(?) AND d very same thing, but this time in a Jumanji-like world... .
GRAEBER,for the time being.
It's about the "background" as an illusion/utopia.
You, going to buy a book(?) AND d very same thing, but this time in a Jumanji-like world... .
August 15, 2025 at 4:16 AM
My bad. Sorry. Let's try with Carl Wennerlind:"Casualties of Credit -The English Financial revolution". Plz stop reading Dr
GRAEBER,for the time being.
It's about the "background" as an illusion/utopia.
You, going to buy a book(?) AND d very same thing, but this time in a Jumanji-like world... .
GRAEBER,for the time being.
It's about the "background" as an illusion/utopia.
You, going to buy a book(?) AND d very same thing, but this time in a Jumanji-like world... .
P18/662:"For most of human history- at least, the History of states and empires-most human beings have been told that they are debtors(plz see note4!).
August 14, 2025 at 8:21 PM
P18/662:"For most of human history- at least, the History of states and empires-most human beings have been told that they are debtors(plz see note4!).
1) than by reframing them in the langage of debt(...)"
August 14, 2025 at 8:15 PM
1) than by reframing them in the langage of debt(...)"