Would u consider d following ?
Ch8 of d book below starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
Would u consider d following ?
Ch8 of d book below starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
To begin , would u read Ch4 of the book below on ur left plz?
After, regarding debt as a means of enslavement, perhaps the book below on ur right? Ch6 only?
To begin , would u read Ch4 of the book below on ur left plz?
After, regarding debt as a means of enslavement, perhaps the book below on ur right? Ch6 only?
« Instead, public finance is seen as being dependent on the ‘wealth-creating’ private sector, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of how states are funded ». p.12.
« Instead, public finance is seen as being dependent on the ‘wealth-creating’ private sector, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of how states are funded ». p.12.
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
And regarding your hope. Well, what is money? Where does it come from?
And regarding your hope. Well, what is money? Where does it come from?
« Instead, public finance is seen as being dependent on the ‘wealth-creating’ private sector, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of how states are funded ». These lines are from the book below p.12
« Instead, public finance is seen as being dependent on the ‘wealth-creating’ private sector, leading to a fundamental misunderstanding of how states are funded ». These lines are from the book below p.12
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
About madness, plz read the following part of an article from the late David Graeber.
About madness, plz read the following part of an article from the late David Graeber.
From the very first sentence to the end.
Déjà-vu Nightmare (Oh-ho !) situation !!!
How about a little bit of magic ?
Aren't you able to pinpoint that these communities ARE NOT SHORT OF MONEY(!) ?
U travel between worlds, right?
From the very first sentence to the end.
Déjà-vu Nightmare (Oh-ho !) situation !!!
How about a little bit of magic ?
Aren't you able to pinpoint that these communities ARE NOT SHORT OF MONEY(!) ?
U travel between worlds, right?
Also, regarding "reparations", would you consider reading CH6 of the following book plz?
Also, regarding "reparations", would you consider reading CH6 of the following book plz?
Can I suggest an author about that plz?
Can I suggest an author about that plz?
Also,Ch8 starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
Also,Ch8 starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
Pretty rare (in this space and the others...).
Ain’t that a « 12 angry men » case ?
Pretty rare (in this space and the others...).
Ain’t that a « 12 angry men » case ?
Regarding d quote, it can be a curse, u know? Are u sure that d job has been "correctly" done?
Can u see the link with the subprime crisis? What is money? Where does it come from? Ch6- « Money as inadequate substitute » of d book below
Regarding d quote, it can be a curse, u know? Are u sure that d job has been "correctly" done?
Can u see the link with the subprime crisis? What is money? Where does it come from? Ch6- « Money as inadequate substitute » of d book below
Not possible to have a « serious » discussion between « we » ?
How about starting it with « you » ?
Would u try Ch6 of d book below plz ?« Money as inadequate substitute »... .
Not possible to have a « serious » discussion between « we » ?
How about starting it with « you » ?
Would u try Ch6 of d book below plz ?« Money as inadequate substitute »... .
Also,Ch8 starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
Also,Ch8 starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
Ch8 of d book below starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
Ch8 of d book below starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
Here, of course, money is rare, valuable, not allocated where it is « most needed », and used to control.
In Human economies…, would u read Ch6- « Money as inadequate substitute » of d book below plz ?
Here, of course, money is rare, valuable, not allocated where it is « most needed », and used to control.
In Human economies…, would u read Ch6- « Money as inadequate substitute » of d book below plz ?
1)Ch6- « Money as inadequate substitute »… .
Cuz', « What is money ? Where does it come from ?».
AND
2)Ch8 starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».
1)Ch6- « Money as inadequate substitute »… .
Cuz', « What is money ? Where does it come from ?».
AND
2)Ch8 starts like this :
« ONE MIGHT WELL ASK: If our political and legal ideas really
are founded on the logic of slavery,
then how did we ever abolish it? ».