7. N issued a “statement of apology,” referred to the case as a “dispute with a woman,” and admitted to the facts.

6. Weekly Magazine B reported that the case occurred under the direction of X’s superior, P, at F Television, who deceived X.

5. The case was later reported by Weekly Magazine B. It should be noted that B’s source was not X, and therefore, this does not constitute a breach of X’s confidentiality obligations.

4. F Television kept the case confidential from sponsors, employees, shareholders, viewers, and others, citing the need to protect X’s privacy.

3. While the victim, X, was forced to leave their job, the perpetrator, N, continued to appear on programs for F Television even after the case.

2. Regarding the case, N paid X a settlement.