Isolyth
@isolyth.dev
💛🤍💜🖤
▌▘▘▖▘▖▌▖▘▘▌▖▘▌▘▖▖▘▘▖▘▖▖▖▘▖▖▖▘▘▖
There's never been a better time to have a problem
https://isolyth.dev
▌▘▘▖▘▖▌▖▘▘▌▖▘▌▘▖▖▘▘▖▘▖▖▖▘▖▖▖▘▘▖
There's never been a better time to have a problem
https://isolyth.dev
They also use it in the finals for first passes for textures on skins and stuff
November 11, 2025 at 5:39 AM
They also use it in the finals for first passes for textures on skins and stuff
I believe a lot of the reason they used AI voices here is because they already had the tech from The Finals, and they did it there because they planned to do dynamic call-outs in matches for stuff that happens/player names, but they (still :[ ) haven't added it, outside of one season
November 11, 2025 at 5:38 AM
I believe a lot of the reason they used AI voices here is because they already had the tech from The Finals, and they did it there because they planned to do dynamic call-outs in matches for stuff that happens/player names, but they (still :[ ) haven't added it, outside of one season
Also I have no idea if this is who made the dollcode site, but they seem to be the only missing account in any reference to it, and I cannot find the link anymore, so
November 8, 2025 at 4:06 AM
Also I have no idea if this is who made the dollcode site, but they seem to be the only missing account in any reference to it, and I cannot find the link anymore, so
It seems like @demi was a bridgy account to wetdry.world/users/demi which does seem to still be up, but does not seem to have any mention of dollcode :(
june (@demi@wetdry.world)
8.21K Posts, 62 Following · mdni dni; i am a minor
▌▘▘▖▖▖▌▌▖▖awawa
@doskel@doskel.net <-- paired unit
all interactions are platonic unless they're with it. we are in a closed, exclusive relationshi...
wetdry.world
November 8, 2025 at 4:05 AM
It seems like @demi was a bridgy account to wetdry.world/users/demi which does seem to still be up, but does not seem to have any mention of dollcode :(
Reposted by Isolyth
no, they're weirdly coy about this
they produced a 235B, 480B, and then 1T model within a span of like 2 months though and there are some artifacts in the 30B
this is also the subject of enduring rumors which I have seen reasonably trustworthy people vouch for
they produced a 235B, 480B, and then 1T model within a span of like 2 months though and there are some artifacts in the 30B
this is also the subject of enduring rumors which I have seen reasonably trustworthy people vouch for
November 5, 2025 at 10:16 PM
no, they're weirdly coy about this
they produced a 235B, 480B, and then 1T model within a span of like 2 months though and there are some artifacts in the 30B
this is also the subject of enduring rumors which I have seen reasonably trustworthy people vouch for
they produced a 235B, 480B, and then 1T model within a span of like 2 months though and there are some artifacts in the 30B
this is also the subject of enduring rumors which I have seen reasonably trustworthy people vouch for
It's pretty decent! It misgendered me in the memory summaries (funny considering I tell it what to use in the customization prompt) but the actual content is super relevant. I will probably keep it paused for whatever shred of determinism I can get, but the implementation seems pretty good
November 4, 2025 at 8:01 PM
It's pretty decent! It misgendered me in the memory summaries (funny considering I tell it what to use in the customization prompt) but the actual content is super relevant. I will probably keep it paused for whatever shred of determinism I can get, but the implementation seems pretty good
For some reason my pds (pds.isolyth.dev) does not seem to be appearing here :( it also stopped showing up on that other list of PDSs. Any idea why?
https://pds.isolyth.dev
__ __
/\ \__ /\ \__
__ \ \ ,_\ _____ _ __ ___\ \ ,_\ ___
/'__'\ \ \ \/ /\ '__'\/\''__\/ __'\ \ \/ / __'\
/\ \L\.\_\ \ \_\ ...
pds.isolyth.dev
November 3, 2025 at 4:51 AM
For some reason my pds (pds.isolyth.dev) does not seem to be appearing here :( it also stopped showing up on that other list of PDSs. Any idea why?
I just saw it note in its reasoning trace that it thought it was chatGPT by openAI and then get confused because the system prompt (there wasn't one...) said it as minimax-m2 😭😭😭
October 27, 2025 at 2:20 PM
I just saw it note in its reasoning trace that it thought it was chatGPT by openAI and then get confused because the system prompt (there wasn't one...) said it as minimax-m2 😭😭😭
"IMPORTANT: MiniMax-M2 is an interleaved thinking model. Therefore, when using it, it is important to retain the thinking content from the assistant's turns within the historical messages." This is unique though! Very nice!
October 27, 2025 at 1:55 PM
"IMPORTANT: MiniMax-M2 is an interleaved thinking model. Therefore, when using it, it is important to retain the thinking content from the assistant's turns within the historical messages." This is unique though! Very nice!