Izzie Fulcher
@isabelfulcher.bsky.social
statistics + reproductive health
leading science @ Delfina
former data fellow @ Harvard
https://www.isabelfulcher.com/
leading science @ Delfina
former data fellow @ Harvard
https://www.isabelfulcher.com/
In the recently published paper, we used a comparative interrupted time series design leveraging data from abortions...
⌛ before vs. after the ROE Act
👥 minors vs. "older teens" who were not impacted by the new ROE Act
⌛ before vs. after the ROE Act
👥 minors vs. "older teens" who were not impacted by the new ROE Act
February 22, 2025 at 4:26 PM
In the recently published paper, we used a comparative interrupted time series design leveraging data from abortions...
⌛ before vs. after the ROE Act
👥 minors vs. "older teens" who were not impacted by the new ROE Act
⌛ before vs. after the ROE Act
👥 minors vs. "older teens" who were not impacted by the new ROE Act
First, a little history refresher:
From 1997 to 2020, minors seeking abortions in MA had to receive parental consent *or* go before a judge.
However, almost all judicial bypass cases were approved... so this just created unnecessary barriers for young people.
(screenshot from @ppact.org)
From 1997 to 2020, minors seeking abortions in MA had to receive parental consent *or* go before a judge.
However, almost all judicial bypass cases were approved... so this just created unnecessary barriers for young people.
(screenshot from @ppact.org)
February 22, 2025 at 4:26 PM
First, a little history refresher:
From 1997 to 2020, minors seeking abortions in MA had to receive parental consent *or* go before a judge.
However, almost all judicial bypass cases were approved... so this just created unnecessary barriers for young people.
(screenshot from @ppact.org)
From 1997 to 2020, minors seeking abortions in MA had to receive parental consent *or* go before a judge.
However, almost all judicial bypass cases were approved... so this just created unnecessary barriers for young people.
(screenshot from @ppact.org)