or i should say, their own idea of what being a particular "normal" sex is

The problem with the way some people seem to use gendered socialization is just cissexism. Instead of attempting to describe actually existing modes of socialization they assume that there's just one for each of "normal" sexes, and most related judgements follow from that.

Dreaming of systems so perfect that no one will need to be good

isnt the similarity assumed in the notion of "lossless substitution"? it seems ur just assuming c :)

yeah but thats because they are bad characters

data structures generally

harder to sell, us is a very significant gaming market

Liv AGar

since the only comprehension you have access to is your own, i read these kind of statements mostly as self-reports.

tbh historically "breeding" was often the actual role of the queen

The fact that the images are generated by stable diffusion is the cherry on top

"oooouuuuggggh i wish using the terminal felt more like talking to a person" statements dreamed up by the utterly deranged

they probably just noticed what it does to meat compared to water

isnt that discourse just this again

idk if liberal feminism is able to contend with women's libidinal investment in fascism the same way it at least attempts to acknowledge the male one