Glad you added the vice versa, otherwise I'd have assumed you thought both teams were Bedfont!

We saw their previous FA Cup game, away to Guernsey. Was quite a fun 1-1 at the new fortress of Sarnian football, but ultimately pointless as Guernsey were expelled for fielding an ineligible player!

Similarly, zfin.org/ZDB-GENE-030... and www.ensembl.org/Danio_rerio/... are both about "titin, tandem duplicate 2", but ZFIN call the gene "ttn.2", whereas Ensembl again repeat the human name "TTN".

Despite having ZFIN IDs and ZFIN descriptions, thousands of genes have human names. For example, compare zfin.org/ZDB-GENE-030... and www.ensembl.org/Danio_rerio/.... Both have a description of "titin, tandem duplicate 1", but ZFIN correctly call the gene "ttn.1" and Ensembl call it "TTN".

It's worse than that:
www.mancity.com/news/club/ma...

I contacted #Ensembl and they are talking to #ZFIN in order to improve things. We're hoping to see a big improvement in Ensembl 114. But for now, in our lab, we are using the Ensembl 109 annotation for #zebrafish. For more info see:

github.com/iansealy/ens...

#Ensembl 110 had the same issue when it was first released, which affected anyone who downloaded the data immediately. For example, g:Profiler results can vary by Ensembl release.

But it's not just names. Many #zebrafish genes are no longer annotated to #ZFIN genes or to GO terms or to Reactome pathways.

Many #zebrafish genes have changed name in recent releases, with more now having HGNC (human) names rather than #ZFIN ones.