At the conclusion of my review, I am left with many questions about this document, but most of all I wonder about the Palm Beach "visitor" with a star next to their name.

This visitor is the final one listed; but singularly starred. This name is included, de-emphasized, and apparently important.

Examining the final 10 pages of the DOJ Epstein release, we gain insight into the investigation itself. These 10 pages are not evidence; they are summaries produced by investigators.

DOJ notes indicate there are several witnesses, a list of Palm Beach "visitors," and a long list of "masseuses."

What is the date of the handwritten notes?

Why is it handwritten?

Why was that summary produced - and for whom?

Very few names appear in the "massage" notes. Considering the extent of the redactions, were the names that do appear disclosed deliberately?

Names were redacted to protect victims and personal information. If a name is not redacted, does this mean the DOJ has a reason?

P. B. presumably refers to Palm Beach. In other words, these actual "visitor massages" seem to have taken place in Palm Beach, Florida.

Much has been said of Epstein's island; but these notes seem to describe events that happened within the Palm Beach community. Several witnesses are noted.

A handwritten arrow indicates two "visitors" are swapped, as if the order matters; but the list is unordered.

There are two columns on the visitors page but only one set of tick marks. Is this one list with two columns? What could the column headings be?

Does each row correspond to a "massage?"

The stated reason for redaction is different on each page, depending on the type of information redacted.

The email list is redacted for personal contact information. The other pages are redacted for victim information.

The handwriting of the "massage visitors" list looks similar to the "Important email" page. Were these lists written by an investigator? Are these 3 pages a summary of the investigation?

The rest of the document, containing flight logs and the address book, was already public information.

Due to redactions, the DOJ release contains less information than existing versions of those documents.

Only the "massage" list is new info to me; and its existence is remarkable.

Eh, the original link to the binary got messed up - and tbh that's probably for the best.

I genuinely considered whether to link a binary from a post ... Definitely not a best practice to run code you found on social media.

github.com/iandennismil...