HARBORNE TENANTS’ BILLIARDS & SNOOKER CLUB
@htsc1947.bsky.social
Founded in 1908, Harborne Tenants’ Snooker Club is a member’s billiards & snooker club situated in the heart of Harborne.
DM for membership enquiries.
DM for membership enquiries.
No thanks. The Ryder Cup is special party because if it’s history.
Snooker should have a 3-player World Cup thou, for national teams.
Snooker should have a 3-player World Cup thou, for national teams.
September 30, 2025 at 12:55 AM
No thanks. The Ryder Cup is special party because if it’s history.
Snooker should have a 3-player World Cup thou, for national teams.
Snooker should have a 3-player World Cup thou, for national teams.
Reposted by HARBORNE TENANTS’ BILLIARDS & SNOOKER CLUB
The stats don’t lie.
The Beeb is complicit in broadcasting in a way that’s entirely unbalanced.
And Mason, as editor, should be held to account.
The Beeb is complicit in broadcasting in a way that’s entirely unbalanced.
And Mason, as editor, should be held to account.
September 23, 2025 at 9:39 AM
The stats don’t lie.
The Beeb is complicit in broadcasting in a way that’s entirely unbalanced.
And Mason, as editor, should be held to account.
The Beeb is complicit in broadcasting in a way that’s entirely unbalanced.
And Mason, as editor, should be held to account.
Reposted by HARBORNE TENANTS’ BILLIARDS & SNOOKER CLUB
Mason was supposed (I think) to be talking about the conference BUT more than half the interview was Mason's faux anger and questions about RefUK ... and he claims there's no bias 🤷
The BBC then had to state after the interview that they are impartial. Deary deary me!
The BBC then had to state after the interview that they are impartial. Deary deary me!
September 23, 2025 at 10:13 AM
Mason was supposed (I think) to be talking about the conference BUT more than half the interview was Mason's faux anger and questions about RefUK ... and he claims there's no bias 🤷
The BBC then had to state after the interview that they are impartial. Deary deary me!
The BBC then had to state after the interview that they are impartial. Deary deary me!
Only Fred Davis has defended a first-time win.
Joe Davis was seeded into the final in 1928 and John Pulman defended via a challenge match. Both cannot properly count.
So it should really be just the ‘curse’.
Joe Davis was seeded into the final in 1928 and John Pulman defended via a challenge match. Both cannot properly count.
So it should really be just the ‘curse’.
September 12, 2025 at 9:39 AM
Only Fred Davis has defended a first-time win.
Joe Davis was seeded into the final in 1928 and John Pulman defended via a challenge match. Both cannot properly count.
So it should really be just the ‘curse’.
Joe Davis was seeded into the final in 1928 and John Pulman defended via a challenge match. Both cannot properly count.
So it should really be just the ‘curse’.