Use of "//" indicates out of character
(I mean, we dont either, but we catch slack for it. You should too.)
(I mean, we dont either, but we catch slack for it. You should too.)
we'll pretend to care, as justification to hunt you down, but worth it
also, you ready to gamble on that? its a mighty big risk you're taking, assuming a particular target doesn't have it
Come at the king, better not miss etc etc
we'll pretend to care, as justification to hunt you down, but worth it
also, you ready to gamble on that? its a mighty big risk you're taking, assuming a particular target doesn't have it
Come at the king, better not miss etc etc
--Yes it is.
No it isn’t. It’s just contradiction.
--No it isn’t.
--Yes it is.
No it isn’t. It’s just contradiction.
--No it isn’t.
Oh sure, but when we plan to consume your 9th Gen Elders you get all touchy and defensive.
Oh sure, but when we plan to consume your 9th Gen Elders you get all touchy and defensive.
i agree with you, the chatbot bro's aren't as bad as LL's. and if a LLM helps someone avoid eviction, thats good.
but it's not an easy automatic decision of which is worse, which says something
i agree with you, the chatbot bro's aren't as bad as LL's. and if a LLM helps someone avoid eviction, thats good.
but it's not an easy automatic decision of which is worse, which says something
Presence is a hell of a drug.
Presence is a hell of a drug.
Those NPCs have shown up in subsequent games. So as ST, yes, as PC, no.
Those NPCs have shown up in subsequent games. So as ST, yes, as PC, no.
"Am I out of touch? no no, it's the staff who are wrong"
"Am I out of touch? no no, it's the staff who are wrong"
it may cause emotional stress among their staff, but that doesn't show up on spreadsheets for the C-suite
it may cause emotional stress among their staff, but that doesn't show up on spreadsheets for the C-suite