🌭
banner
hot-dog-hell-yeah.bsky.social
🌭
@hot-dog-hell-yeah.bsky.social
i crash out and take a few weeks and then crash out again. because i have PASSION.
wild turkey and beef tallow smoothies are back on the menu
November 25, 2025 at 6:18 PM
If they don’t get to decide the Presidential election like they did in 2000, I’m sure SCOTUS will work to suspend the clause before the next Democratic President is inaugurated.
November 20, 2025 at 7:58 PM
“State law requires that a person be on board a driverless vehicle and be able to take over operations if necessary, MnDOT spokesperson Anne Meyer told Axios.”
November 20, 2025 at 3:22 PM
hell yeah
November 16, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Aaron, we the users want the platform to succeed.

For that to continue, we need clarification from the moderation team on why a month-old Johnny Cash reference constituted a ban, but a clear violation of the community standards by the @deptofwar.bsky.social has been ignored? Inequitable policy?
November 15, 2025 at 9:47 PM
They admitted it took an entire month before they took down the Johnny Cash reference.

Maybe they need another month to address this violent threat?
November 15, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Meanwhile the Department of War account is even more popular and can say “we will kill you” without even a warning from Bluesky mods.
November 14, 2025 at 7:12 PM
ah man now I’m even more confused
November 12, 2025 at 8:51 PM
It’s in the article. One set of emails is between Michael Wolff and Jeffrey Epstein, and the other set is between convicted Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.
November 12, 2025 at 4:14 PM
meh
November 8, 2025 at 6:44 AM
WolframAlphaNazi
November 8, 2025 at 6:37 AM
obviously all bullshit but I’m done being surprised
November 8, 2025 at 4:30 AM
WHERES THE ONION LINK

I want to smell the onions and mustard
November 8, 2025 at 3:59 AM
just like mama used to make at home
November 7, 2025 at 11:09 PM
She took a stance by saying “no thanks” and will lose out on potential income because of it.
November 7, 2025 at 8:06 PM
Probably invited him to the Oval Office because he was old and reminded them of their other friend Gordon. Guess we’ll just be satisfied with that and call it a day.
November 7, 2025 at 7:52 PM
Probably should have picked someone a little younger and healthier that didn’t look like Gordon Findlay’s stunt double.
November 7, 2025 at 7:23 PM
I read it and Dan doesn’t explain why they selected an anonymous collapsing white guy to serve as their “success story” at a press conference.
November 7, 2025 at 6:49 PM
I guess I’m just curious who this Gordon is and why he was invited. Seems reasonable to ask that.
November 7, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Dan talked to White House sources and said the guy is “Gordon” and a patient.

Why did they pick this Gordon to appear and be the poster child for the drug?
November 7, 2025 at 6:43 PM
The point is to question whether the reputable sources were lied to. Rather than take them at their word, do a bit of research and provide evidence of who this guy actually was and why he was in the Oval Office to begin with. Show photos that make it clear it’s not Gordon Findlay.
November 7, 2025 at 6:36 PM
I’d love to see those photos comparing this Gordon to that Gordon. The man in the Oval Office looked like Gordon Findlay to me.

Not saying it’s impossible they have the same face and first name, just need more evidence than “White House sources say.”
November 7, 2025 at 5:35 PM