Photo © @rosesrebellion.bsky.social
If 1 email says I killed Elvis, 1 million saying other stuff don’t change that. But mentioning the 1 is ‘cherry-picking’?
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
If 1 email says I killed Elvis, 1 million saying other stuff don’t change that. But mentioning the 1 is ‘cherry-picking’?
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Except that before Beetlejuice it was the Bellman’s Rule.
www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43909/...
Except that before Beetlejuice it was the Bellman’s Rule.
www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43909/...
And if the Times had written “1m more on benefit” (implied: “a benefit”) it would have been pedantically correct - but still misleading to readers who are not scholars of headline grammar.
And if the Times had written “1m more on benefit” (implied: “a benefit”) it would have been pedantically correct - but still misleading to readers who are not scholars of headline grammar.