Hoffmeister25
banner
hoffmeister25.bsky.social
Hoffmeister25
@hoffmeister25.bsky.social
Generating energy to manifest Archeofuturist Authoritarian Singapore on Mars, one post at a time.
Alright, have fun on election night again in four years, bud. I predict you’re going to be in for another very unpleasant surprise.
December 18, 2024 at 7:37 PM
I want you to *try* — just make a perfunctory attempt! — to consider other possible changes voters thought Trump could enact. Might perhaps *immigration*, *policing and vagrancy issues*, *the proliferation of minority set-asides*, all be issues that might be on others’ minds?
December 18, 2024 at 7:10 PM
Not a single commenter appears to have even entertained the possibility that there might be good, reasonable, non-stupid reasons to prefer Trump. The most charitable interpretation they can muster is, “The poor dears are too dumb and immature to realize how bad he is.” The stench of cope is pungent.
December 18, 2024 at 7:02 PM
I mean, their music is fine, but I don’t think it’s worthy of a Nobel Prize!
December 12, 2024 at 11:56 PM
Puerto Rico literally does have a massive sanitation/garbage-collection issue. It is, in a very real sense, an island full of garbage. Perhaps many Puerto Rican Americans, who fled (or whose families fled) Puerto Rico to the mainland *for a reason*, recognized the truth behind the joke.
December 5, 2024 at 11:51 PM
@tracewoodgrains.bsky.social some of this art seems relevant to your interests.
December 3, 2024 at 3:14 PM
Don’t forget Nordic demographics.
December 2, 2024 at 6:45 PM
Monet also omitted the dogs! The coward.
December 2, 2024 at 6:38 PM
FOOLS, do you understand how powerful you are making him?!
November 21, 2024 at 8:14 PM
McBride very clearly does not look like a “normal woman” - and once you hear McBride’s voice, the game is fully over. Once again the myth of the “passing trans woman” rears its ugly head.
November 21, 2024 at 4:44 PM
Imprisoning gay people was a bad thing to do, and I’m not defending it. Again, I’m not using the Nazis as an example of something we should emulate. YOU brought them up, not me, and you’re trying to pin their actions on me. Again, the Nazis’ approach to eugenics was brutish and counterproductive.
November 21, 2024 at 3:04 PM
There are criminals in all demographics. There’s just a greater *proportion* of criminals in some demographics than in others. That’s just a fact. And no, the “mentally ill” are just… the mentally ill. Schizophrenics, ASPD, very low IQ, etc. There’s no euphemism, no secret message.
November 20, 2024 at 7:55 PM
No, that is not what I said. I didn’t say Hitler was great - I said the opposite of that. I genuinely think you lack reading comprehension, or are otherwise unable to parse nuance. I don’t think there’s anything else either of us are going to get out of this exchange.
November 19, 2024 at 2:45 PM
There was never a “mask on”, **dawg**. I’m saying the same stuff here I’ve said plenty of other places. Whatever else I am, I’m not pretending to be something I’m not.
November 19, 2024 at 6:16 AM
I’m not trying to prove anything to you. I don’t know you, don’t care about you, and have been given no indication that you’re an intellectually serious person. But others who are more open-minded and less full of sanctimony may find what I’m saying more interesting.
November 19, 2024 at 5:58 AM
I’m happy Hitler failed; murdering millions of healthy, high-functioning (not to mention innocent & morally blameless) Jews was a staggering dysgenic (and evil) action. Had he stuck to sterilizing the mentally ill and criminals, he’d be remembered fondly today instead of being a great monster.
November 19, 2024 at 5:52 AM
This particular idea of theirs was *good*! Many of their other speculations about the malleability of human nature ran aground against reality once attempted; if they’d had the sophisticated understanding of genetics and the means to gene-edit we’re building now, we could have seen them vindicated.
November 19, 2024 at 5:47 AM
Was W.E.B. Dubois a fascist? Was Margaret Sanger? Both were enthusiastic proponents of eugenics & believed in the promise of improving unequal genetic stick via eugenic measures (i.e. abortion for inferior bio-stock) and both understood asymemetries in relative genetic capital b/w different groups.
November 19, 2024 at 4:36 AM
There is no consensus among medical professionals about the efficacy, necessity, reversibility, etc. of this treatment. Doctors have been badly wrong before (i.e. thalidomide) due to being earnestly misinformed by pharma companies, or corrupted by perverse financial incentives.
November 19, 2024 at 4:25 AM
You dodged my question and returned to petty name-calling. I think intelligent people can identify when you don’t have a more nuanced argument.
November 19, 2024 at 2:13 AM
I don’t treat “bodily/medical autonomy” as a terminal value. I’m perfectly fine w/ the state taking an active stance in the “medical” and “reproductive” decisions of families.
November 19, 2024 at 1:59 AM
Do you support mandated childhood vaccination? Do you believe families should be free to, say, perform FGM on their daughters? Should families be free to force, say, extreme experimental/religious diets on their children even if it could threaten children’s lives?
November 19, 2024 at 1:58 AM