Carles
LightNews LightNews
banner
hikaizenpm.com
Carles
@hikaizenpm.com
170 followers 1.1K following 20 posts
Hey
Posts Replies Media Videos
hikaizenpm.com
Yeah, the second I see Ezra Klein’s name attached to anything it’s an instant confirmation it’s absolute ass.
June 20, 2025 at 1:31 PM
hikaizenpm.com
Because you’re right. It’s neo lib washing the vocabulary for deregulation without actually addressing root causes. Same shit, different day.
June 20, 2025 at 1:19 PM
hikaizenpm.com
On some John Wick shit
June 13, 2025 at 7:52 PM
hikaizenpm.com
Oh this team is going to explode spectacularly
May 6, 2025 at 7:22 PM
hikaizenpm.com
Enjoy! Just brewed some over here, myself
April 25, 2025 at 4:03 PM
hikaizenpm.com
whats is it about georgetown having an insane number of dipshit fascists among its ranks
April 25, 2025 at 4:02 PM
hikaizenpm.com
Hank where did the M get the LL it’s based off of? It’s nothing but a regurgitation of stolen content.

They suck and aren’t useful.
April 24, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Reposted by Carles
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
And, from her statement in Thursday’s order: www.lawdork.com/p/breaking-s...
Department sought. Sotomayor laid out the stakes, tying it to her dissent on Monday in the 5-4 Supreme Court order over how challenges to Trump's Alien Enemies Act proclamation can proceed: The Government now requests an order from this Court permitting it to leave Abrego Garcia, a husband and father without a criminal record, in a Salvadoran prison for no reason recognized by the law. The only argument the Government offers in support of its request, that United States courts cannot grant relief once a deportee crosses the border, is plainly wrong. See Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U. S. 426, 447, n. 16 (2004); cf. Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U. S. 723, 732 (2008). The Government's argument, moreover, implies that it could deport and incarcerate any person, including U. S. citizens, without legal consequence, so long as it does so before a court can intervene. See Trump V. J. G. G., 604 U.S. — - (2025) (SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting) (slip op., at 8). That view refutes itself. For now, at least, it did.
April 13, 2025 at 12:40 AM
Reposted by Carles
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
This was from the dissent in Alien Enemies Act opinion: www.lawdork.com/p/scotus-5-4...
In a disturbing paragraph, joined by Kagan and Jackson, Sotomayor wrote: What if the Government later determines that it sent one of these detainees to CECOT in error? Or a court eventually decides that the President lacked authority under the Alien Enemies Act to declare that Tren de Aragua is perpetrating or attempting an "invasion" against the territory of the United States? The Government takes the position that, even when it makes a mistake, it cannot retrieve individuals from the Salvadoran prisons to which it has sent them. See Defendant's Memorandum of Law in Opposition in Abrego Garcia v. Noem, No. 25-cv-951 (D Md., Mar. 31, 2025), ECF Doc. 11, at 7-9. The implication of the Government's position is that not only noncitizens but also United States citizens could be taken off the streets, forced onto planes, and confined to foreign prisons with no opportunity for redress if judicial review is denied unlawfully before re-moval. History is no stranger to such lawless regimes, but this Nation's system of laws is designed to prevent, not en-able, their rise.
April 13, 2025 at 12:38 AM