Balmer's Peak 😄

I don't think so. I think a leader can easily be someone that takes that direction, but has the passion and skill to directly gather and inspire others to go in the same direction. Dissatisfaction with others' direction isn't a requirement.

😄 Nei, det gjør selvfølgelig ikke det. Erna har ikke noe godt fotfeste for å slå ned på økonomisk vinning, så derfor ønsker hun sikkert ikke å trekke noe oppmerksomhet den veien

To feil blir en rett...?

Det man fint kunne ønsket seg var at Erna utviste nok lederskap til å si at hvis man først skal ha styreverv i en privat barnehage så kan man ikke sitte i den komiteen som behandler vilkårene for private barnehager.

Forvaltningsloven som regulerer bl.a. habilitet i forvaltningen gjelder ikke for Stortinget. Ref Forvaltningsloven § 4, fjerde ledd.

Sure, and it's a decent response, but I'd argue that BlueSky makes sense. Especially within the tech sphere, which is a non-trivial part of Sessionize.

In our latest CfP, several speakers mentioned the lack of BlueSky and commented on that Facebook and X was a bit ...outdated.

Ser jo at den ikke står seg så godt på et behandlingssted, men jeg satte pris på at du delte den her.

Jeg synes den var fin fordi det gir meg som foreldre noen punkter jeg kan snakke om med en av ungene mine. Ikke at vi ikke har snakket om emnene før, men greit med litt validering når man står oppi det.

Well, apparently they _are_ dumb since generating search results via decoding seems like a really poor way to find a reliable result.

Okay.

It depends on how OpenAI does the search. If they use the LLM features to generate an answer, that is not a search and it will hallucinate. But if it's using embeddings to find matches in its source, it will not hallucinate. Since OpenAI folks aren't dumb, they're probably doing the latter.

Yeah, I had an Amiga 500, after my C64, and I expanded that from 512kB to 1MB and later 3MB total. And it was A LOT!

Yeah, I'd say that a document with detailed instructions rooted in old and outdated knowledge isn't much of a step down from the EA.

I don't think anyone here is arguing that we should remove architecture. For me it's more a discussion of the right level of detail, that architecture is better if you understand what's inside your boxes and a view that you should be somewhat involved in the consequences of your choices.

Shit can get written down continuously, no? ADRs and stuff. Writing down decisions that you have made early, without proper knowledge, sounds bad.

Isn't this just the "Architects that no longer build shouldn't unilaterally dictate how the team should build" discussion?

Excited to see it!