Heidi Moore
@heidim.bsky.social
This Bill DeBlasio story just got 10x better. Here’s another article from 2020 that was written about him.
"Other times I say, 'You're really starting to annoy me. I don't have time to answer these emails.’” 😭
melmagazine.com/en-us/story/...
"Other times I say, 'You're really starting to annoy me. I don't have time to answer these emails.’” 😭
melmagazine.com/en-us/story/...
October 31, 2025 at 4:17 AM
This Bill DeBlasio story just got 10x better. Here’s another article from 2020 that was written about him.
"Other times I say, 'You're really starting to annoy me. I don't have time to answer these emails.’” 😭
melmagazine.com/en-us/story/...
"Other times I say, 'You're really starting to annoy me. I don't have time to answer these emails.’” 😭
melmagazine.com/en-us/story/...
Great find! I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that this bulletin was published on June 10, 2025. 👀 And still doesn’t explain why a government plane is withheld. Do you know if AF1 (the real one) shows up normally?
www.faa.gov/licenses_cer...
www.faa.gov/licenses_cer...
October 23, 2025 at 3:44 AM
Great find! I’m sure it’s just a coincidence that this bulletin was published on June 10, 2025. 👀 And still doesn’t explain why a government plane is withheld. Do you know if AF1 (the real one) shows up normally?
www.faa.gov/licenses_cer...
www.faa.gov/licenses_cer...
How do you like them apples? 😏
October 21, 2025 at 3:44 AM
How do you like them apples? 😏
“We see the same trends globally: rule of law abused by those in control, free media silenced, critics imprisoned, and societies pushed towards authoritarian rule and militarisation. In 2024, more elections were held than ever before, but fewer and fewer are free and fair.”
October 10, 2025 at 1:38 PM
“We see the same trends globally: rule of law abused by those in control, free media silenced, critics imprisoned, and societies pushed towards authoritarian rule and militarisation. In 2024, more elections were held than ever before, but fewer and fewer are free and fair.”
“We see the same trends globally: rule of law abused by those in control, free media silenced, critics imprisoned, and societies pushed towards authoritarian rule and militarisation. In 2024, more elections were held than ever before, but fewer and fewer are free and fair.”
October 10, 2025 at 1:35 PM
“We see the same trends globally: rule of law abused by those in control, free media silenced, critics imprisoned, and societies pushed towards authoritarian rule and militarisation. In 2024, more elections were held than ever before, but fewer and fewer are free and fair.”
It appears that her niece used to live at the property in the indictment (her current address matches the zip in the Pulte referral). Aside from the Second Home Rider being flimsy, I’d also think renting to family (probably without much profit), will be viewed differently than an investment property
October 10, 2025 at 2:58 AM
It appears that her niece used to live at the property in the indictment (her current address matches the zip in the Pulte referral). Aside from the Second Home Rider being flimsy, I’d also think renting to family (probably without much profit), will be viewed differently than an investment property
I’m saying the niece used to live at the property in the indictment - 3121 Peronne Ave. If the DOJ indicted James over renting to her niece, I understand why other attorneys did not want to bring charges (aside from other issues with the case).
October 10, 2025 at 2:52 AM
I’m saying the niece used to live at the property in the indictment - 3121 Peronne Ave. If the DOJ indicted James over renting to her niece, I understand why other attorneys did not want to bring charges (aside from other issues with the case).
I wonder if she rented this property to her niece prior to the 2023 co-purchase?
October 10, 2025 at 2:32 AM
I wonder if she rented this property to her niece prior to the 2023 co-purchase?
Could a property management company qualify under that description? Here’s the Second Home Rider; it seems like there’s quite a bit of wiggle room here.
“…or unless extenuating circumstances exist that are beyond Borrower’s control.”
“…or unless extenuating circumstances exist that are beyond Borrower’s control.”
October 10, 2025 at 1:39 AM
Could a property management company qualify under that description? Here’s the Second Home Rider; it seems like there’s quite a bit of wiggle room here.
“…or unless extenuating circumstances exist that are beyond Borrower’s control.”
“…or unless extenuating circumstances exist that are beyond Borrower’s control.”
Thank you for explaining all this, Steve! I saw at the round table event earlier today that Trump is floating the idea of labeling Antifa as a FTO. Is he able to do that, and if so, I’m guessing it makes this spectacle a whole lot worse?
October 9, 2025 at 1:22 AM
Thank you for explaining all this, Steve! I saw at the round table event earlier today that Trump is floating the idea of labeling Antifa as a FTO. Is he able to do that, and if so, I’m guessing it makes this spectacle a whole lot worse?
Judge Immergut has set a hearing for 7pm Pacific Time tonight!
October 6, 2025 at 1:41 AM
Judge Immergut has set a hearing for 7pm Pacific Time tonight!
This NY Post headline choice was shocking to see!
October 5, 2025 at 11:44 PM
This NY Post headline choice was shocking to see!
I’m shocked to see this headline choice from the NY Post. Do you agree that he’s defying a court order? It surely seems like a childish way to avoid the ruling, but the ruling pertains only to the OR National Guard, not CA?
October 5, 2025 at 11:42 PM
I’m shocked to see this headline choice from the NY Post. Do you agree that he’s defying a court order? It surely seems like a childish way to avoid the ruling, but the ruling pertains only to the OR National Guard, not CA?
Steve, Gov Newsom is stating that 300 CA NG troops are being deployed to OR under Trump’s order. I reread your great piece on Illinois v. Texas, but in that case Texas was willing to send the NG. I’m assuming that the CA NG are federalized, so I don’t think SCOTUS’ original jurisdiction could apply?
October 5, 2025 at 6:09 PM
Steve, Gov Newsom is stating that 300 CA NG troops are being deployed to OR under Trump’s order. I reread your great piece on Illinois v. Texas, but in that case Texas was willing to send the NG. I’m assuming that the CA NG are federalized, so I don’t think SCOTUS’ original jurisdiction could apply?
Governor Pritzker just announced on Twitter that Trump is federalizing 300 Illinois National Guard troops in Chicago.
x.com/govpritzker/...
x.com/govpritzker/...
October 4, 2025 at 6:00 PM
Governor Pritzker just announced on Twitter that Trump is federalizing 300 Illinois National Guard troops in Chicago.
x.com/govpritzker/...
x.com/govpritzker/...
I think it’s about Richman too, but regardless, is the actual indictment even within the 5 year SOL? The indictment says by “falsely stating…” but the 2020 testimony (that falls with the statute of limitations) only says “I stand by the testimony.”
September 26, 2025 at 2:09 PM
I think it’s about Richman too, but regardless, is the actual indictment even within the 5 year SOL? The indictment says by “falsely stating…” but the 2020 testimony (that falls with the statute of limitations) only says “I stand by the testimony.”
Everyone is assuming it’s McCabe, but Richman was recently subpoenaed by the DOJ and Jake Tapper reported that the indictment is related to “Arctic Haze” which had to do with Richman leaking to the NYT.
September 26, 2025 at 4:35 AM
Everyone is assuming it’s McCabe, but Richman was recently subpoenaed by the DOJ and Jake Tapper reported that the indictment is related to “Arctic Haze” which had to do with Richman leaking to the NYT.
Jake Tapper is reporting that the indictment relates to “Arctic Haze” & Dan Richman. @annabower.bsky.social has a great write-up about it here.
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...
September 26, 2025 at 2:43 AM
Jake Tapper is reporting that the indictment relates to “Arctic Haze” & Dan Richman. @annabower.bsky.social has a great write-up about it here.
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...
www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...
@radiofreetom.bsky.social & @timmiller.bsky.social You guys seem to have touched a nerve. “I’m not panicking, you’re panicking!”
July 19, 2025 at 4:47 AM
@radiofreetom.bsky.social & @timmiller.bsky.social You guys seem to have touched a nerve. “I’m not panicking, you’re panicking!”
I thought the NYT’s article was really insightful too. I’m seeing people point out that Mr. Zients said “I approve the use of autopen.” Do you have any concerns surrounding that (as opposed to him saying something along the lines of “I showed the draft to Biden and he approves the use of autopen”)?
July 14, 2025 at 9:34 PM
I thought the NYT’s article was really insightful too. I’m seeing people point out that Mr. Zients said “I approve the use of autopen.” Do you have any concerns surrounding that (as opposed to him saying something along the lines of “I showed the draft to Biden and he approves the use of autopen”)?
I really appreciate you explaining this to all of us! If I’m reading 10 U.S.C. § 12406 correctly, it only pertains to the NG, but the memo states that other forces may be called upon, and I saw Hegseth say they’ll bring in Marines if necessary. Would using other forces require the Insurrection Act?
June 8, 2025 at 3:40 AM
I really appreciate you explaining this to all of us! If I’m reading 10 U.S.C. § 12406 correctly, it only pertains to the NG, but the memo states that other forces may be called upon, and I saw Hegseth say they’ll bring in Marines if necessary. Would using other forces require the Insurrection Act?
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social I’m sure it’s just an error, but the revised declaration the government filed is literally blank.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Class counsel also filed their reply.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Class counsel also filed their reply.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
June 2, 2025 at 9:31 PM
@chrisgeidner.bsky.social I’m sure it’s just an error, but the revised declaration the government filed is literally blank.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Class counsel also filed their reply.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Class counsel also filed their reply.
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
J.O.P. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Judge Gallagher was not happy with the government’s status report regarding their efforts to facilitate Cristian’s return from CECOT:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Here’s the declaration:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Judge Gallagher was not happy with the government’s status report regarding their efforts to facilitate Cristian’s return from CECOT:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Here’s the declaration:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
May 30, 2025 at 9:10 PM
J.O.P. v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Judge Gallagher was not happy with the government’s status report regarding their efforts to facilitate Cristian’s return from CECOT:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Here’s the declaration:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Judge Gallagher was not happy with the government’s status report regarding their efforts to facilitate Cristian’s return from CECOT:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Here’s the declaration:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...