Well they didn't say it makes it impossible. But that's inferred because there's no other reason for this to be brought up.
Well they didn't say it makes it impossible. But that's inferred because there's no other reason for this to be brought up.
Important point was Upton never should have been in there and Peggie never should have faced retaliation for challenging.
Important point was Upton never should have been in there and Peggie never should have faced retaliation for challenging.
Witness was speculating alteration by respondent 2, not proven. Respondent 1 bungled handling of case, again. Poor standards of practice for extraction of evidence, which has resulted in questions of veracity.
Witness was speculating alteration by respondent 2, not proven. Respondent 1 bungled handling of case, again. Poor standards of practice for extraction of evidence, which has resulted in questions of veracity.