Hannah Wright
@hannahwright.bsky.social
Researching militarism, coloniality, state violence, abolition, gender, race, class. Lecturer at University of Manchester. She/her. ♿️
https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/hannah-wright
https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/hannah-wright
The words of Manchester Jewish Action for Palestine (posted on Instagram) seem particularly prescient in light of the Home Secretary’s comments framing pro-Palestinian protests as insensitive to the victims of this terrible attack.
October 3, 2025 at 11:24 AM
The words of Manchester Jewish Action for Palestine (posted on Instagram) seem particularly prescient in light of the Home Secretary’s comments framing pro-Palestinian protests as insensitive to the victims of this terrible attack.
Looking back at some of my own undergraduate essays and they are littered with snarky asides. Apologies to Dr Leopold for making this hard to mark by including the claim that Charles Fourier was “bonkers”. Though honestly I think this would make marking more enjoyable for me.
August 15, 2025 at 3:40 PM
Looking back at some of my own undergraduate essays and they are littered with snarky asides. Apologies to Dr Leopold for making this hard to mark by including the claim that Charles Fourier was “bonkers”. Though honestly I think this would make marking more enjoyable for me.
I spent weeks searching Google scholar/UoM library for something that reads poststructuralist feminism through the lens of materialism/Marx/Gramsci/ideology and it was Ebay’s ‘based on your recent views’ section of all things that came up with the goods
June 25, 2025 at 3:44 PM
I spent weeks searching Google scholar/UoM library for something that reads poststructuralist feminism through the lens of materialism/Marx/Gramsci/ideology and it was Ebay’s ‘based on your recent views’ section of all things that came up with the goods
It has also been used in far-right "anti-woke" discourse (including by Tory ministers) to argue that civil servants and their alleged fixation with EDI *threatens* diversity of thought. The language of diversity often enables this co-optation by evading questions of power and structural injustice.
January 6, 2025 at 6:04 PM
It has also been used in far-right "anti-woke" discourse (including by Tory ministers) to argue that civil servants and their alleged fixation with EDI *threatens* diversity of thought. The language of diversity often enables this co-optation by evading questions of power and structural injustice.
I'm grateful to Security Dialogue for publishing my new (open access) article exploring how discourses on promoting 'diversity of thought' circulate in the UK national security policy community, and the political work they do in relation to hegemonic security thinking 🧵: doi.org/10.1177/0967...
January 6, 2025 at 6:04 PM
I'm grateful to Security Dialogue for publishing my new (open access) article exploring how discourses on promoting 'diversity of thought' circulate in the UK national security policy community, and the political work they do in relation to hegemonic security thinking 🧵: doi.org/10.1177/0967...