Hannah C. Wylie
banner
hannahcaler.bsky.social
Hannah C. Wylie
@hannahcaler.bsky.social
I write fiction and creative nonfiction, but lately I can’t ignore all the corruption in front of me.

Follow for language that means something again ✍🏻 (and also laughs, I swear)
What I wouldn’t give for the chance to verbally bitchslap that man.
February 10, 2026 at 4:28 AM
Until they name names, better safe than sorry. The cost of shielding predators should be up close and personal every day.
February 10, 2026 at 12:40 AM
As long as someone is actively giving away piles of money and trying not to be a billionaire I have grace for them, but I don’t think earning money through status as an entertainer means someone should get to be a billionaire. Clinging to more money than you can spend is selfish and embarrassing.
February 10, 2026 at 12:19 AM
Some people would rather see the world burn than admit they were wrong
February 9, 2026 at 11:13 PM
It’s time to treat them all as exactly the same, do not let any of them alone in a room with a child. Operate as if the Republican Party member list is just a list of registered offenders. Ask Mike Johnson why he doesn’t particularly care about sex trafficking of children.
February 9, 2026 at 11:11 PM
I think we need to bring in a world-class interrogator. Surely she’s not remotely smart enough to avoid being tricked into implicating such a sloppy nitwit
February 9, 2026 at 10:58 PM
She’s self-obsessed and only really cares about her public image as a “maverick” and ensuring the success of Israel’s genocide in Palestine
February 9, 2026 at 10:47 PM
Plus he’s decidedly anti-murder, that’s novel at this point
February 9, 2026 at 10:44 PM
An old Apprentice contestant literally talked about Trump shitting himself during filming. It started before 2017, bet.
February 9, 2026 at 10:27 PM
He should probably pay them first if he wants them to suppress voters for him
February 9, 2026 at 8:37 PM
I think Susan Collins blocked me
February 9, 2026 at 8:36 PM
I still don’t understand why people need to see these particular files when there’s plenty of available witness and victim accounts implicating Dump in so much perverse detail it’s impossible that they all “made it up”
February 9, 2026 at 8:33 PM
And yet, no Larry Ellison? How much you wanna bet Trump is even more concerned with protecting his sugar daddy than himself?
February 9, 2026 at 8:31 PM
Did someone say that?
February 9, 2026 at 8:28 PM
So then why did they just let him in to see the files? One thing no one can argue is their glaring incompetence— a violently protected DOJ can’t even commit crimes adequately.
February 9, 2026 at 8:27 PM
Jesus, it’s hard enough to get doctors to ask all relevant questions and set aside bias.
February 9, 2026 at 8:19 PM
What I’d really love is for someone to jump ship out of self-preservation. We just need like one or two whistleblowers trying to avoid jail time
February 9, 2026 at 8:17 PM