John Loadsman
banner
grumpygasbag.bsky.social
John Loadsman
@grumpygasbag.bsky.social
@j-clin-anesth.bsky.social @elsevierconnect.bsky.social this problem was also brought to your attention more than two years ago. Surely something needs to be done here… pubpeer.com/publications...
PubPeer - The effect of play distraction on anxiety before premedicati...
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: The effect of play distraction on anxiety before premedication administration: a randomized trial (2017)
pubpeer.com
November 23, 2025 at 11:47 AM
@j-clin-anesth.bsky.social @elsevierconnect.bsky.social this issue was reported to your journal nearly three years ago yet nothing much seems to be happening... pubpeer.com/publications...
PubPeer - A comparative study between propofol and dexmedetomidine as...
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: A comparative study between propofol and dexmedetomidine as sedative agents during performing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (2016)
pubpeer.com
November 23, 2025 at 11:19 AM
Reposted by John Loadsman
Hey @tandfresearch.bsky.social, - you should not allow authors to address photoshopped tumors by just leaving out the photoshopped tumors. This paper was 1 year old at the time of correction. Where are the originals?
Horrible editorial decision.
#ImageForensics
October 20, 2025 at 9:21 PM
Retracted September 2025…
This is different. Eyeglasses and candles for mean markers. Perhaps the editor(s), reviewers and Wiley could have borrowed the candles and glasses to help them see the problems with the error bars pubpeer.com/publications...
October 7, 2025 at 3:24 AM
Reposted by John Loadsman
We don’t know if it’s the fastest retraction ever, but the speed is nonetheless notable: A journal retracted a paper 22 hours after a sleuth raised concerns about the article.
Journal issues speedy retraction in less than a day for ‘inadvertent mistake’
We don’t know if it’s the fastest retraction ever, but the speed is nonetheless notable: A journal retracted a paper 22 hours after a sleuth raised concerns about the article.  On August 9 jus…
retractionwatch.com
October 3, 2025 at 7:19 PM
@annsaudimed.bsky.social you might want to ask the authors to address some questions that have been raised about their paper pubpeer.com/publications...
July 5, 2025 at 11:24 AM
The excellent form of @elsevierconnect.bsky.social continues...
April 19, 2025 at 5:01 AM
March 25, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Reposted by John Loadsman
We would like to thank the awardees, speakers, moderators, and guests for the wonderful evening at the 2024 #EinsteinFoundationAward ceremony! @kaiwegner.bsky.social @regberlin.bsky.social @elisabethbik.bsky.social @pubpeer.com @helenajambor.bsky.social @chrischmied.bsky.social
March 14, 2025 at 10:47 PM
At least they didn't use a serif font for the error bars. https//e-century.u...
March 6, 2025 at 12:33 PM
Reposted by John Loadsman
A simulated ‘can’t intubate, can’t oxygenate’ manikin crossover study investigating a modified front-of-neck access airway device

journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1...
December 31, 2024 at 4:30 AM
This is different. Eyeglasses and candles for mean markers. Perhaps the editor(s), reviewers and Wiley could have borrowed the candles and glasses to help them see the problems with the error bars pubpeer.com/publications...
December 26, 2024 at 9:03 PM