You're talking about venture capitalists here. Famous for their deep understanding of romance.

Isn't Andresson worth hundreds of millions? What definition of "can't get ahead" is he using?

awareness of the different ways a channel could distinguish itself. As far as I can tell, many OF models actively try to look like and imitate others, thinking that will lead to success. But in marketing, it's what's *different* that's memorable, not what's the same.

Just selling software was a differentiator. Now, it takes a billion-dollar marketing budget to become a significant player.

With OF, I think there's plenty of room for opportunity. But now, it's about finding and owning a niche. Too much OF content looks the same, with very little

Any new market opportunity is relatively easy for first movers. Everyone's experimenting to find what resonates with the market. The bar is low. Then things get more sophisticated and everything is more crowded. Microsoft's first software came in stapled plastic baggies--

Then you definitely won’t be purchasing a 10-pack of assorted Pilot Frixion pens with vibrant, colorful ink that’s 100% erasable and will transform everything from your doodles to your Thermo notes.

That’s me with all stationery supplies.

The fact that Mark “I am very smart” Andreessen is an investor in your client is not the credential you think it is.

Sharing the world especially with GenAI companies

One side was all like "we're gonna crash the plane so hard, it's going to be the most beautiful plane crash ever, you won't even believe it" and the other side was like, "can you believe they published a 900 page document describing their plans to crash the plane?" and voters chose the plane crash.

Step one: stop falling for five specific manipulative social media headlines. #3 will shock you to your core!

“Will go down as.” My, that’s certainly optimistic.

Unfortunately they’re actually not that smart. They’re really doing this out of stupidity, not even the dignity of an evil supervillain plot.

This is the man who won’t even respond to his children's mothers requesting child support

It’s probabilistic, trained on billions of pages of The web. With that large a data set, it’s basically just a cross section of the internet demographic, reflective of a normal distribution. The most likely completions will mediocre. That’s what it’s designed to do.

📌

📌

All that said, however, no politician gets a pass for actively supporting a man who is dismantling the mechanisms. It’s one thing to hate the game but play it as well as you can. It’s another to knock over the board and try to take all the money.