Greg Marks
@gmarks100.bsky.social
Learning about politics for a LONG time, organizational change agent/manager, grandparent, music lover, junk collector, techie/nerd
Yes, jam other news in the pipeline to block the big stuff from view.
June 7, 2025 at 12:55 AM
Yes, jam other news in the pipeline to block the big stuff from view.
Yup, no evidence of DEI ever being in action there. Shameful.
May 18, 2025 at 6:18 PM
Yup, no evidence of DEI ever being in action there. Shameful.
They'll try this everywhere they can. Lower prices? Peace in Ukraine on day one? They're eating the cats - the anti-immigrant push? Nope, full-fledged autocratic, racist, greed-driven, white Christian Nationalist power grab.
April 27, 2025 at 9:41 PM
They'll try this everywhere they can. Lower prices? Peace in Ukraine on day one? They're eating the cats - the anti-immigrant push? Nope, full-fledged autocratic, racist, greed-driven, white Christian Nationalist power grab.
Is there no law enforcement? Breaking and entering?
April 1, 2025 at 1:15 AM
Is there no law enforcement? Breaking and entering?
Can anyone point to the specific Project 2025 team training session in which that is said? This use of alternative communication paths to avoid accountability should be highlighted and widely publicized.
March 28, 2025 at 12:46 AM
Can anyone point to the specific Project 2025 team training session in which that is said? This use of alternative communication paths to avoid accountability should be highlighted and widely publicized.
3. Did Mike Waltz deliberately invite Jeffrey Goldberg because he knew these security breaches were happening AND really incompetent people were involved? Talking to Trump directly would have been futile. Was this an act of courage and honor?
March 25, 2025 at 11:24 PM
3. Did Mike Waltz deliberately invite Jeffrey Goldberg because he knew these security breaches were happening AND really incompetent people were involved? Talking to Trump directly would have been futile. Was this an act of courage and honor?
2. They were using their personal smart phones, not government-issued secure devices. This poses the prospect that if even one is hacked, all these conversations are exposed.
They should be questioned about how often they've used Signal versus the secure systems, in private Senate Hearings.
They should be questioned about how often they've used Signal versus the secure systems, in private Senate Hearings.
March 25, 2025 at 11:24 PM
2. They were using their personal smart phones, not government-issued secure devices. This poses the prospect that if even one is hacked, all these conversations are exposed.
They should be questioned about how often they've used Signal versus the secure systems, in private Senate Hearings.
They should be questioned about how often they've used Signal versus the secure systems, in private Senate Hearings.