CDC making unscientific and unfounded statements like this only leads to decimated trust in vaccines.

These are IPCC numbers.

The 'scientific consensus', so to speak.

Also see 'Global warming in the pipeline' (Hansen et al., 2023) where we wrote:

"We conclude that the GHG increase since 1750 already produces a climate forcing equivalent to that of 2 × CO₂"

academic.oup.com/oocc/article...

For anyone seeking comprehensive human immunity insights and up-to-date epidemiological news, check out any other invaluable resource other than Dr. Topol for your inquiries. Here's a solid starter pack:
/finis
bsky.app/starter-pack...

Indeed..

I've asked every climate scientist who should know if they are aware of research on the climate effects of the additional 80% desulphurisation over the Mediterranean next May.

They were all completely oblivious about the new IMO regulation.

This will keep going up:

What we lack, is a #LongCOVID clinical test for SARS-CoV persistence to be able to evidence that many who are suffering post-vaccine injury symptoms are in fact suffering from #LongCOVID from an asymptomatic SARS-CoV infection. An infection that was less severe, because of their vaccine immunity.

We never stopped working on a SARS/MERS vaccine and about to do clinical trials in 2020 after 9 years of field testing the formulation on every military member who vacationed to the hostile parts of the Middle East with a gun.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...

The vaccine spike cannot produce the Fibrinogen caused by viral spike. Even the viral spike cannot cause fibrinogen on it's own. What is required for micro-clots are other viral proteins in addition to the spike protein with plasmin cleavage ability.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...

Some think we shouldn't even mention the increased rate of warming associated with desulphurization, because of the knee-jerk respon of "let's emit sulphur on purpose".

I think that's wrong. We need to be clear and honest about the risks of both.