To me the logic is simple. He asks the petition to be approved, it happens, he has to sign it to become legal and he does.
Then his DOJ retains them because they're part of an active investigation that will never end.

It doesn't matter. The house may approve it. The senate will approve it, the orange pedo will sign it, and the DOJ will say that it's an active investigation and hold them forever.

Most systems are somewhat infected with some kind of dormant or active trojan that makes very little impact on the performance of your system and masks itself as a legit service.
Antivirus and firewalls are reactive to new threats, so they're always a step behind.
An aware user is the best defense.

I'd say A, but I think it'll give an error.

Most people, even at not so shitty hotel bars, are not aware of the sound pollution they're emitting. That's very rude, of course, but too many people believe that their comfort is the only one that matters.
Long gone are the days of "my rights end where yours begin".

Absolutely! Just need to tell me how you like it. A lot of my friends come to visit just for the coffee. I consider myself a coffee gourmet!

I made it myself, just how I like it!

I call it "my lane, your lane"

purposes the “mandate” has no enforcement mechanism. Why that matters: It changes what “constitutional” might mean in this context.

Don't tell lies, and just to quote you "fuck" Trump and MAGA.

The Supreme Court in 2021 did not rule the mandate constitutional or unconstitutional — they ruled the challengers lacked standing. So saying it “remains constitutional” is not quite accurate legally; rather, the Court left it in place.
The mandate’s penalty is zero; so for practical 🧵

was reduced to zero (in the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act of 2017) so effectively the enforceable mandate ended.

The constitutional/legal vitality of the law did not collapse when the penalty went to zero. So the first statement is partially valid but exaggerated. 🧵

The idea that “without the mandate … the whole plan simply cannot work” is a policy claim, not a settled legal fact. Whether the law would collapse or suffer significantly depends on actuarial, economic and behavioural variables — not just the legal mandate.

Also: the mandate’s penalty 🧵

It was a great season and I hope the core of the team comes back next year for another try at the world series.

In modern society there are very few reasons that can justify hunting of any kind.
Whether you hunt for moose, buffalo, lions, ducks or any other form of life; in its vast majority it's a sport. And every loss of life for the sake of entertainment is unacceptable to me.
But, that's just me...

I'm a relatively new Canadian, 15 years in the country.
I can name a couple of leaders that I saw performing well, biased, with objections but no solutions, but they were decent people.
Until PP came. That's when MAPLE MAGA took shape. And it's embarrassing as leader of the CPC. The deserve better!

🤗

Don't go to the cafeteria before doing the food poisoning seminar.
Someone may play a trick on you!