Sadly, not this time. Their Vanilla shake is great, I still need to try chocolate

My main issue with such headlines is that, no matter what the article actually states and whether it opposes it in the final conclusion, they nonetheless insinuate that these are valid arguments/questions and elevate misogynistic talking points. This is not, and never will be, a good-faith debate.

If we're already on the subject of how women 'impact' the workplace, perhaps the NYT could also publish a piece on how women also improve organisational culture, foster collaboration, enhance productivity, performance, and overall success, etc. etc.

There's actual research on this.

I compared two reports on this "Whites only" community some time ago and tried to illustrate why one is substantially worse than the other. bsky.app/profile/gabr...

Yeah but these people aren’t know for following simple rules

The "good things" they did for the country, such as the ÖVP-FPÖ's labour law, which reintroduced a 12-hour workday.

And yes, the cordon sanitaire does actually work, as studies show.

To give one example, the prominent Austrian extreme right figure Martin S. now calls for a "Stadtbildwende" [Cityscape change].

Die FPÖ steht mittlerweile bei 34–38% in den Umfragen. Vielleicht sollte das Anlass zum Nachdenken geben. bsky.app/profile/euro...

This divide gets even more interesting when you factor in vote choice: having children is *the top* personal marker of success for Gen Z males who voted for Trump. For Gen Z females who voted for Trump, it ranks 6th.

Among Gen Z men & women who voted for Harris, it ranks 9th and 12th, respectively.