I am of the mindset that inclusion of diverse participants (barring necessary scientific justification e.g. exclusion of cis men from a pregnancy study) should be a requirement for journal publication these days. I hope as a field we can start to enact this!

So long as the science is strong and the communication is clear and effective, voice is nominal in my opinion. I’d much rather read compelling science with a strong narrative, regardless of active or passive voice.

I am of the mindset that inclusion of diverse participants (barring necessary scientific justification e.g. exclusion of cis men from a pregnancy study) should be a requirement for journal publication these days. I hope as a field we can start to enact this!

Congratulations!! 🎉 sounds like an interesting study too

Oh no! This has happened in a few labs I’ve been a part of - it’s such an invasion. Hope you can get it taken care of easily & safely!

I finally learned to convert between school year and grade by adding 1 (so 8th grade is year 9). I’ve been here almost 8 years and it still trips me

ChatGPT to the rescue! The IRB here asked that we run all our text through a readability scoring system - which scores what grade your text is at. Fascinating. readabilityformulas.com/readability-...

@bellephd.bsky.social this would be awesome 👀