Futurewise
@futurewise.bsky.social
We work across Washington to create livable communities, ensure clean healthy waterways, and protect farms, forests & habitat for this & future generations.
Ryan, chair of the @43rddemocrats.org
knows we can balance the need for more housing, and a healthy tree canopy.
"We are Strong supporters of walkable cities and strong supporters of finding the balance between urban canopy of trees and adding more housing density to our city"
knows we can balance the need for more housing, and a healthy tree canopy.
"We are Strong supporters of walkable cities and strong supporters of finding the balance between urban canopy of trees and adding more housing density to our city"
September 12, 2025 at 11:59 PM
Ryan, chair of the @43rddemocrats.org
knows we can balance the need for more housing, and a healthy tree canopy.
"We are Strong supporters of walkable cities and strong supporters of finding the balance between urban canopy of trees and adding more housing density to our city"
knows we can balance the need for more housing, and a healthy tree canopy.
"We are Strong supporters of walkable cities and strong supporters of finding the balance between urban canopy of trees and adding more housing density to our city"
Reposted by Futurewise
and on Monday 9/15, join me and @burhanazeem.bsky.social @andersem.bsky.social @futurewise.bsky.social @charlescgardner.bsky.social for a debate on the merits of inclusionary zoning. it was invented right here in Montgomery County in 1974, and I'm on the side of "it is generally good"–
September 8, 2025 at 6:02 PM
and on Monday 9/15, join me and @burhanazeem.bsky.social @andersem.bsky.social @futurewise.bsky.social @charlescgardner.bsky.social for a debate on the merits of inclusionary zoning. it was invented right here in Montgomery County in 1974, and I'm on the side of "it is generally good"–
Now what? The city has 30 days to appeal, or 1-year to amend their plan.
August 12, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Now what? The city has 30 days to appeal, or 1-year to amend their plan.
The Hearings Board agreed with us on two big issues with the Mercer Island comp plan:
-Failed to plan for enough housing – supply or affordability – especially lower-income housing
-Failed to complete a subarea plan for new housing and development around the light rail
-Failed to plan for enough housing – supply or affordability – especially lower-income housing
-Failed to complete a subarea plan for new housing and development around the light rail
August 12, 2025 at 8:32 PM
The Hearings Board agreed with us on two big issues with the Mercer Island comp plan:
-Failed to plan for enough housing – supply or affordability – especially lower-income housing
-Failed to complete a subarea plan for new housing and development around the light rail
-Failed to plan for enough housing – supply or affordability – especially lower-income housing
-Failed to complete a subarea plan for new housing and development around the light rail