I really, truly do not understand why more leftists don't tell him to fuck off, given that every time the left commits any kind of action, this piece of shit is going to speculate that it was a false flag.

Another popular twitter account that needs an *extremely* degraded social environment to feed off. I really would welcome the site breaking, so people like this have a harder time exploiting public pathology for clout and substack subscriptions.

They will become more irrational as they realize they have to clamp down without the public in their corner.

Just to say, their behavior in acting as if they have public endorsement on the one hand, and the actual public mood on the other, will move in different directions. It won't be like a boat rising with a tide.

They will come across as unreasonable to much of the public, as they stress that they have rationality on their side and are standing against socially impermissible behavior.

Time to request my archive for the 12th time since Elon took over. So many false alarms!

The only thing that upholds rule of one group over others internal to a social movement is forced deprivation. We have to *necessarily* affirm in our reproduction that forced deprivation is off-limits to overcome capital.

There can be delegated responsibility, but they can not have unaccountable authority. This is necessary, not just for the sake of good vibes and niceness, but to overthrow capital's rule on our social reproduction.

This is where, as a Marxist, I can have disagreements with anarchists, about where hierarchy might not actually be a problem in select situations. But there can not be an elevated group that has more power than others within the revolutionary class.

Which means there can be no chain of command that designates some members of the group as more important. In a situation where there is a mass consciousness, delegation can happen. A structure with internal hierarchy could still be situated in an overruling social consciousness.

We must all, regardless of conscious want or unconscious desire, reaffirm that human life is worthless on its own. Communism in its reproduction with a revolutionary movement must do the opposite.

This is basically the heart of what I'm getting at when I talk about ideological reproduction in capitalism vs the necessary ideological parameterizes of social reproduction in communism. The former forces us into behavior where we affirm its logic.

It forces us to get rid of attachments that center any aspect of humanity that seeks cooperation and center all aspects of humanity that cut against that and reaffirm the individual as detached from a context and self-sustaining.

Or we can defy this economic regime's logic and say worth can't be quantified at all to render us ineligible for basic needs. But what capitalism is constantly centering is that human life, on its own, is worth less than what it costs to reproduce.

To overcome this, we can raise each other up to being worth the baseline that capitalism won't provide, thus establishing, for the first time, a basic humanity that must be respected and preserved.

The capitalist class itself only perseveres through kind of class solidarity. But the reproduction of our society is reified into patterns that pit humans against one another for the sake of economic generation.