Fernando Martel García
banner
fmgbsky.bsky.social
Fernando Martel García
@fmgbsky.bsky.social
𝙲𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚊𝚕 𝙸𝚗𝚏𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 | 𝚁𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚌𝚑 𝙿𝚛𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚎 | 𝙴𝚗𝚝𝚛𝚎𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚎𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚑𝚒𝚙

𝕎𝕒𝕤𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕘𝕥𝕠𝕟, 𝔻.ℂ. | Blog: https://www.fernandomartel.com/blog-1
Such a metric of success may introduce a conservative incentive, no? E.g. where are you more likely to deviate all else equal: Doing a field experiment in a war torn country, or with grad student at Yale? Which would you choose if you wanted to minimize deviations?
September 24, 2025 at 11:49 PM
Here is one example onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...

My motivation comes for something I wrote a while back. See the section entitled "Move fast, break (little) things" in this blog post www.fernandomartel.com/post/politic...
The value of information and optimal clinical trial design
Traditional sample size calculations for randomized clinical trials depend on somewhat arbitrarily chosen factors, such as type I and II errors. Type I error, the probability of rejecting the null hy...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
August 29, 2025 at 3:12 PM
Value of Information for deciding what initiatives to experiment on, and inform experiment design?
August 28, 2025 at 5:29 PM
TIL the auto save feature only works if you have a OneDrive account and the file is in a OneDrive folder.

"Growth teams" need to drive M365 subscriptions!

Even If you have a subscription, if you are working on an Excel file shared by a client in a Dropbox folder, Auto save won't work. 🤦‍♂️
July 17, 2025 at 1:03 PM
A big confounder here is age. E.g. the population of Barcelona is much older than that of LA. Would be good to plot death rates by age cohort across cities .
July 13, 2025 at 5:54 PM
For the sake of argument:

If the test is a good predictor of job performance, and they can ace the test with AI, should they also not be able to ace the job with AI?

Maybe the problem here is that using AI is consider cheating?
February 16, 2025 at 2:13 AM
No doubt things have improved, and continue to get better.

But ten years ago I doubt you would have gotten those responses....
February 13, 2025 at 3:19 AM
*AJPS
February 10, 2025 at 9:37 PM
10 years ago or so AJOS had an official editorial policy of not accepting unsolicited rejoinders or replications.

Of course, many replications of positive findings are likely to be null.

Not sure if that policy has changed but to me it was a major red flag for political science, as a science.
February 10, 2025 at 9:36 PM
Reposted by Fernando Martel García
Many follow scientists for their science, not politics. I wish there was a community norm to label political posts #political. That way users can filter out politics, and scientists can freely express views without fear of losing followers. It's a win win.
January 30, 2025 at 2:05 AM
Many follow scientists for their science, not politics. I wish there was a community norm to label political posts #political. That way users can filter out politics, and scientists can freely express views without fear of losing followers. It's a win win.
January 30, 2025 at 2:05 AM
Adding a Public Choice perspective....
January 24, 2025 at 1:42 PM
The question is a little unclear: What if you compare the means of rank transformed data?
January 24, 2025 at 3:10 AM
Wasn't there a time when IV was all the rage?
January 24, 2025 at 2:54 AM
Reminds me of Tim Berners-Lee vision of the Semantic Web (plus a sprinkling of Robotic Process Automation).
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semanti...
January 24, 2025 at 2:22 AM