„there are only 2 things you can't do with the music here; use it to advertise right wing politics or causes, or use it to promote meat, dairy, or other animal products.“
„there are only 2 things you can't do with the music here; use it to advertise right wing politics or causes, or use it to promote meat, dairy, or other animal products.“
for fucks sake
for fucks sake
anyway my home page hasn't got the memo and is still showing all the posts from the people i just unfollowed. what a fun and interactive feature.
anyway my home page hasn't got the memo and is still showing all the posts from the people i just unfollowed. what a fun and interactive feature.
All Al generated imagery is inherently theft. It's unethical, environmentally disastrous, and does irreparable harm to both artists and society.
All Al generated imagery is inherently theft. It's unethical, environmentally disastrous, and does irreparable harm to both artists and society.
I live in the West Midlands in England, where variation in English morphology definitely has social meaning. 1/2
Inspired by a colleague on X, I think my favourite Bill Labov quote is:
“I have resisted the term *sociolinguistics* for many years, since it implies that there can be a successful linguistic theory or practice which is not social.”
Thank you for everything, Bill.
I live in the West Midlands in England, where variation in English morphology definitely has social meaning. 1/2
何それ
(in all seriousness though i mainly just don't know the best resources to do it)
何それ
(in all seriousness though i mainly just don't know the best resources to do it)
some ghoul: don't you think that's a bit ... Prescriptivist of you?
me: 😪
some ghoul: don't you think that's a bit ... Prescriptivist of you?
me: 😪
Here’s a thread on the most up-to-date research on this captivating figure.
Here’s a thread on the most up-to-date research on this captivating figure.
Pessimist: The cup is half empty
Linguist: OK what about if you were describing the cup yesterday? Would the sentence change at all? What if you heard this secondhand from someone versus you saw it for yourself?
Pessimist: The cup is half empty
Cosmologist: The cup is dusty or full of gravitational waves
Pessimist: The cup is half empty
Astronomer: This is a high metallicity sightline
Pessimist: The cup is half empty
Linguist: OK what about if you were describing the cup yesterday? Would the sentence change at all? What if you heard this secondhand from someone versus you saw it for yourself?