Bryan Lammon
banner
finaldecisions.org
Bryan Lammon
@finaldecisions.org
Lawyer & law professor focused on appellate jurisdiction. Founder of Final Decisions PLLC (finaldecisions.org).
W&M 3Ls Jon Gharib, Jack Kerdasha, and Raahim Zaidi did excellent work on this brief. My immense thanks to them.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
#17 in Daniel Mook v. G. Hall (4th Cir., 25-1677) – CourtListener.com
BRIEF by Daniel P. Mook. Type of Brief: RESPONSE. . Do any cases pending in this court or the Supreme Court of the United States raise similar issues? NO.. [1001876934] [25-1677] Bryan Lammon [Entered...
storage.courtlistener.com
November 15, 2025 at 9:01 PM
Somewhat relatedly, there was also a recent decision from the Seventh Circuit on the deadline for seeking a partial judgment under Rule 54(b).

finaldecisions.org/the-timeline...
The Timeliness of a Rule 54(b) Partial Judgment - Final Decisions PLLC
The Seventh Circuit held that there was no jurisdictional time limit on seeking a Rule 54(b) partial judgment. And it questioned earlier decisions imposing a 30-day deadline (albeit a non-jurisdiction...
finaldecisions.org
September 9, 2025 at 1:43 PM
A few years ago, it looked like courts were starting to re-examine whether district courts can "re-certify" orders after a party misses the deadline for seeking permission to appeal.

finaldecisions.org/another-cour...
Another Court Says No Restarting the § 1292(b) Clock - Final Decisions PLLC
The D.C. Circuit joined the Seventh Circuit in holding that “recertifying” an order for interlocutory appeal does not restart § 1292(b)’s ten-day deadline.
finaldecisions.org
September 9, 2025 at 1:43 PM
I saw this decision, too, and I think it's seriously mistaken—and not in the way the panel seemed to think. This looks like a case of conflating the existence of a "final decisions" (which give appellate courts jurisdiction) with the entry of a "final judgment" (which starts the appeal clock).
August 22, 2025 at 6:29 PM
My quick read suggests that this makes the common mistake (at 15–16) of thinking that a defense's being an immunity is sufficient for the collateral-order doctrine. But a defense still needs to be separate from the merits, which many (most? all?) defenses aren't.

finaldecisions.org/immunities-t...
Immunities & the Rest of the Collateral-Order Doctrine - Final Decisions PLLC
The Fourth Circuit suggested that a defense’s providing an immunity from litigation is enough for the collateral-order doctrine. But what about the doctrine’s other requirements, particularly separate...
finaldecisions.org
July 4, 2025 at 12:21 PM
I wrote a bit about this a few weeks ago, when Judge Oldham mentioned it in a footnote that the other panel members didn't join.

finaldecisions.org/questioning-...
Questioning the Collateral-Order Doctrine & Pendent Appellate Jurisdiction - Final Decisions PLLC
A Fifth Circuit decision expressed some doubts about the collateral-order doctrine and pendent appellate jurisdiction.
finaldecisions.org
July 4, 2025 at 12:21 PM