But fossil fuel companies weren't political, according to Meta 🙄

I wonder if that's going to increase the gap in healthy life expectancy..

And would ozempic help us get smaller cars again?

I was not aware. That's great!

There's four studies on it now, all consistently showing it helps. All with caveats (secondary outcomes, epidemiology)

GP doesn't want to prescribe, doesn't want the links to studies. Private GP said the exact same thing. I now have to wait for the clinic, who won't come back in time, if at all.

I can't imagine that working for a final project though...

It takes a lot of creativity away from students to mostly rely on exams

For me, the best way to deal with bad news is to do something about it. If you're busy campaigning or helping others, you can't doom scroll

I'm concerned with the algorithms or prejudice that leads to these kinds of media diets. I imagine it's more of the former.

And yes, that impacts the content too. I rarely see women cook shows normalise copious meat consumption for instance.

Are you familiar with the women in energy starter packs: go.bsky.app/AGCURBf might have some inspiration on who to follow!

I do hope the new ICJ advisory on climate change will make it less likely to succeed

Needs to meet both IOM and CCC criteria

You'd be surprised at how large the uncertainty is of world population data. We might end up with a Byrnihat population estimate between -500 million and +500 million this way