Maybe for very remote/small towns it should remain an option. For the vast majority, it's not worth the risks

Signature comparison is pseudo science, and may be eliminated in the future

But in any case, even remote places can open a polling station with paper ballots and hand counting. It's very cheap

I don't claim there's evidence of tampering

But a free and fair election should prevent vote purchase and intimidation, and this is impossible when you can prove what you voted

Also, I heard from folk who moved in that they received ballots of previous owners in the address and could vote for them

And someone can see exactly what you vote, meaning they can intimidate you or purchase your vote

Also, people can get voting ballots of others by mail, when addresses change, etc

It would be much better if everyone did paper ballots voting on a day off

Mail in voting is probably only necessary because of the lack of a national holiday day off for elections

Mail votes can facilitate purchase of votes or intimidation into voting (by allowing people to reliably prove how they voted)

Paper ballots only - hand counted, in a day off is the way

לא מרגיש שום הבדל?

I think @ukrainematters.bsky.social and other analysts describe this situation differently

Are there any liberal billionaires who could prevent this catastrophe?

I wonder how long he keeps that act as the support from the fsb dries out

Good luck with your project to destroy the Democratic coalition

bsky.app/profile/dere...

Pete has not taken away anyone's dignity

It's just nitpicking for the sake of finding something to mark him impure

So yes, he didn't pass your purity test and now you want to expel one of the best communicators the Dems have in order to have an ever purer tiny Dem kernel that can resist fascism together, ineffectively

What are you talking about??

Did Pete fail some purity test?