As for the hot take, I wouldn’t doubt it. As the old saying goes, elite defenses like OKC’s have the advantage over elite offenses—while great shooters can run hot or cold, great defenses are always a crucible.
As for the hot take, I wouldn’t doubt it. As the old saying goes, elite defenses like OKC’s have the advantage over elite offenses—while great shooters can run hot or cold, great defenses are always a crucible.
32/12/15/0, with the zero being turnovers. That’s a special player.
The only key contributor with a ring is Pascal Siakam. This matters in games 1 and 2.
Defensive scheme favors OKC—all that blitzing.
Bench favors Indiana.
32/12/15/0, with the zero being turnovers. That’s a special player.
The only key contributor with a ring is Pascal Siakam. This matters in games 1 and 2.
Defensive scheme favors OKC—all that blitzing.
Bench favors Indiana.
I’m giddy about both teams, but Indiana looks like it’s cracked the code on easy buckets from high pace and halfcourt both, early clock, uncontested. Craziest innovation since the Nash-D’Antoni Suns.
Except who stops SGA? 🤷
🤷🏼
I’m giddy about both teams, but Indiana looks like it’s cracked the code on easy buckets from high pace and halfcourt both, early clock, uncontested. Craziest innovation since the Nash-D’Antoni Suns.
Except who stops SGA? 🤷
🤷🏼