The actress is preparing for her next gig. I get the feeling they're slowly (after killing as many people as they can) getting the public ready for this new Ingsoc thing.

I have to wonder how many are being suppressed and just how far their terraforming of former Twitter will go. It's an alternate reality Scientologist land they're trying to push.

It's never been what it purports to be, but certain assholes insist on normalizing their shitty behavior and telling us how bad we are simply because we're not part of their stupid club and do not value their stupid parties.

There is a whole game played where the "real sex" happens, the stuff that is actually pleasurable, while the majority of men are told they have to beg and scrape for what they know to be nothing. Those who have the real sex always knew the game and all of the tricks.

The other thing is that very often female wives of homosexuals weren't "surprised" or "lied to" about this. They either knew and didn't care or, more often, actively encouraged this behavior. There is nothing about homosexuality that makes a male "essentially damaged" as the insinuation goes.

The extreme focus on insinuation and taboo is an exclusively Galtonite thing, which Francis Galton exhorts his followers to do. Reasonable adults are not that ignorant about what homosexuals do, since there was enough evidence of their behavior throughout history.

This strange focus on essentialism is a modern thing, and it is tied most of all to eugenics and the very malevolent behaviors that sodomy entailed. This strange narrative is promoted by those who have said they want to normalize sodomy and make men gay to tell them they are permanent inferiors.

If you look at how sodomy laws were applied, they were almost always about homosexual rape or obviously malevolent behavior. Two guys sneaking off was almost always overlooked, and among the aristocracy it was an open secret they got away with.

Oh no... what did Elon's jannies get you for?

With the Democrats it was part of a general policy. With Trump it's because Trump wants a hissy fit and has this strange vendetta against late night television.

Even this was never particularly innovative, and the main driver for innovation was the prospect of eliminating human beings, or finding ways to overwork and break human beings into accepting ever-worsening conditions while strengthening the hand of managers against revolt.

Indirectly, new machinery is pursued only because it screws over workers, and for that purpose. The really big period of "high innovation" came after capital was concentrated in monopolies and obsessed with social goals / imposing social order.

Capitalism is notoriously inefficient and un-innovative, going out of its way to destroy inventions and punish firms doing anything differently from the standard arrived at by collusion. You don't get any reward for being truly industrious. You get rewarded for screwing over workers more.

Nearly every labor-saving method is about rearranging the workspace, doing basic things that would have been done without profit as a motive. This is possible first because most people didn't work in factories until modernity, and second because electricity demanded things less wasteful.

Capitalism never really favored "innovation". The habit of science that allowed technological advance developed without the profit motive. It is the incentive of the capitalist to always seek ways to exploit and immiserate before the capitalist invests in a more productive machine.

Mostly the Marxists since the fall of the USSR but these things were always inherent in the Marxist method. I don't know why we're supposed to treat it like this received dogma beyond questioning. It becomes sickening, but then their biggest goal was destroying Christianity.

Everything they are calling "science" is statistical charlatanry of the foulest sort. This has been very violently imposed on us, always for the sake of Eugenics. When it fails, they just make up infinite statistics.

That is the origin of the "Big Lie".

Greco-Roman homophilia, the real sexual ideology of many within the conservative establishment, mandated reproductive relations between men and women as a pure chattel one backed by force independent of desire. Christianity sacrificed homosocial desire to increase intersexual investment

The real politicians don't have to work with any of this ideology. Ideology is the way you destroy public politics and a democratic society, by making the public discuss pure nonsense ad nauseum and insist that is "politics". You can tell which politicians are "exempt" and which are made to lose.