OKC made six MORE 2-pointers (on five more attempts)
OKC made seven MORE 3-pointers (on one FEWER attempt)
OKC committed 14 FEWER turnovers
UTA grabbed nine MORE offensive rebounds
UTA made one MORE free throw (on one fewer attempt)
16-1.
OKC made six MORE 2-pointers (on five more attempts)
OKC made seven MORE 3-pointers (on one FEWER attempt)
OKC committed 14 FEWER turnovers
UTA grabbed nine MORE offensive rebounds
UTA made one MORE free throw (on one fewer attempt)
16-1.
OKC made one MORE 2-pointer (on eight FEWER attempts)
OKC made two MORE 3-pointers (on 10 MORE attempts)
OKC committed two FEWER turnovers
SAC grabbed three MORE offensive rebounds
OKC made six MORE free throws (on same attempts as SAC)
15-1.
OKC made one MORE 2-pointer (on eight FEWER attempts)
OKC made two MORE 3-pointers (on 10 MORE attempts)
OKC committed two FEWER turnovers
SAC grabbed three MORE offensive rebounds
OKC made six MORE free throws (on same attempts as SAC)
15-1.
Holmgren AND Hartenstein on: 19.7% opponent turnover percentage
Hartenstein on, Holmgren off: 17.4% opponent turnover percentage
Holmgren on, Hartenstein off: 16.7% opponent turnover percentage
Double-big lineups have jumped 6.6% from last season.
Holmgren AND Hartenstein on: 19.7% opponent turnover percentage
Hartenstein on, Holmgren off: 17.4% opponent turnover percentage
Holmgren on, Hartenstein off: 16.7% opponent turnover percentage
Double-big lineups have jumped 6.6% from last season.
Best home record: OKC 6-0, GSW 5-0
Best home net rating: OKC +18.8
Best road record: OKC 8-1
Best road net rating: OKC +13.3
OKC has a better road record than 27 teams’ home records.
OKC has a better road net rating than 26 teams’ home net ratings.
Best home record: OKC 6-0, GSW 5-0
Best home net rating: OKC +18.8
Best road record: OKC 8-1
Best road net rating: OKC +13.3
OKC has a better road record than 27 teams’ home records.
OKC has a better road net rating than 26 teams’ home net ratings.
After losing by two points @ POR on Nov. 5, Thunder has won six straight games by 128 combined points (+21.3 average).
After losing by two points @ POR on Nov. 5, Thunder has won six straight games by 128 combined points (+21.3 average).
NOP made four MORE 2-pointers (on 13 MORE attempts)
OKC made five MORE 3-pointers (on 14 MORE attempts)
OKC committed four FEWER turnovers
OKC grabbed one MORE offensive rebound
OKC made 10 MORE free throws (on 13 MORE attempts)
14-1.
NOP made four MORE 2-pointers (on 13 MORE attempts)
OKC made five MORE 3-pointers (on 14 MORE attempts)
OKC committed four FEWER turnovers
OKC grabbed one MORE offensive rebound
OKC made 10 MORE free throws (on 13 MORE attempts)
14-1.
125-for-211 (59.2%) on 2-pointers
31-for-83 (37.3%) on 3-pointers
113-for-126 (89.7%) on free throws
Additionally, he has recorded over FOUR TIMES as many assists (93) as turnovers (23).
125-for-211 (59.2%) on 2-pointers
31-for-83 (37.3%) on 3-pointers
113-for-126 (89.7%) on free throws
Additionally, he has recorded over FOUR TIMES as many assists (93) as turnovers (23).
OKC made 13 MORE 2-pointers (on 11 more attempts)
OKC made five FEWER 3-pointers (on 18 fewer attempts)
CHA committed one FEWER turnover
OKC and CHA grabbed 12 offensive rebounds
OKC made two MORE free throws (on three MORE attempts)
13-1.
OKC made 13 MORE 2-pointers (on 11 more attempts)
OKC made five FEWER 3-pointers (on 18 fewer attempts)
CHA committed one FEWER turnover
OKC and CHA grabbed 12 offensive rebounds
OKC made two MORE free throws (on three MORE attempts)
13-1.
6.6 by Moses Malone in 1979-80
Dennis Rodman’s career high was:
5.7
As of this morning, Mitchell Robinson is averaging:
13.0 offensive rebounds per-36 minutes.
13.
Thirteen
Insane
6.6 by Moses Malone in 1979-80
Dennis Rodman’s career high was:
5.7
As of this morning, Mitchell Robinson is averaging:
13.0 offensive rebounds per-36 minutes.
13.
Thirteen
Insane
Effective field goal percentage: +4.7% (same as last season)
Turnover percentage: +5.2% (-0.1% from last season)
Offensive rebound percentage: -1.4% (+0.1% from last season)
Free throw rate: -0.2% (+0.3% from last season)
Effective field goal percentage: +4.7% (same as last season)
Turnover percentage: +5.2% (-0.1% from last season)
Offensive rebound percentage: -1.4% (+0.1% from last season)
Free throw rate: -0.2% (+0.3% from last season)
His offensive rebounds by game: 5, 6, 5, 8, 3, 3, 3, 5, 5, 5
HOU has outscored opponents by 84 points in his 212 minutes.
His offensive rebounds by game: 5, 6, 5, 8, 3, 3, 3, 5, 5, 5
HOU has outscored opponents by 84 points in his 212 minutes.
Opponent effective field goal percentage: 50.3% (No. 1 in NBA)
Opponent turnover percentage: 17.4% (No. 4 in NBA)
Opponent offensive rebound percentage: 27.8% (No. 5 in NBA)
Opponent free throw rate: 0.296 (No. 21 in NBA)
Opponent effective field goal percentage: 50.3% (No. 1 in NBA)
Opponent turnover percentage: 17.4% (No. 4 in NBA)
Opponent offensive rebound percentage: 27.8% (No. 5 in NBA)
Opponent free throw rate: 0.296 (No. 21 in NBA)
Points per 100 possessions: 41.2
True shooting percentage: 77.3% (!!!)
Assist percentage: 52.7% (!!!)
Steal percentage: 2.6%
On-court net rating: +20.6 (!!!)
.
Total rebound percentage: 21.5% (No. 2 of career, 2021-22)
Points per 100 possessions: 41.2
True shooting percentage: 77.3% (!!!)
Assist percentage: 52.7% (!!!)
Steal percentage: 2.6%
On-court net rating: +20.6 (!!!)
.
Total rebound percentage: 21.5% (No. 2 of career, 2021-22)
OKC made 12 MORE 2-pointers (on seven more attempts)
OKC made one MORE 3-pointer (on four more attempt)
OKC committed nine FEWER turnovers
LAL grabbed three MORE offensive rebounds
OKC made two MORE free throws (on five FEWER attempts)
12-1.
OKC made 12 MORE 2-pointers (on seven more attempts)
OKC made one MORE 3-pointer (on four more attempt)
OKC committed nine FEWER turnovers
LAL grabbed three MORE offensive rebounds
OKC made two MORE free throws (on five FEWER attempts)
12-1.
OKC made six more 2-pointers (on eight more attempts)
OKC made three more 3-pointers (on one more attempt)
OKC committed one fewer turnover
OKC grabbed four more offensive rebounds
OKC made three more free throws (on two more attempts)
11-1.
OKC made six more 2-pointers (on eight more attempts)
OKC made three more 3-pointers (on one more attempt)
OKC committed one fewer turnover
OKC grabbed four more offensive rebounds
OKC made three more free throws (on two more attempts)
11-1.
OKC made 13 more 2-pointers (on five more attempts)
MEM made seven more 3-pointers (on one more attempt)
OKC committed eight fewer turnovers
MEM grabbed two more offensive rebounds
OKC made nine more free throws (on eight more attempts)
10-1.
OKC made 13 more 2-pointers (on five more attempts)
MEM made seven more 3-pointers (on one more attempt)
OKC committed eight fewer turnovers
MEM grabbed two more offensive rebounds
OKC made nine more free throws (on eight more attempts)
10-1.
2019-20: 4.3%
2020-21: 28.6%
2021-22: 35.7%
2022-23: 66.2%
2023-24: 68.0%
2024-25: 64.5%
2025-26 (so far): 90.0%
2019-20: 4.3%
2020-21: 28.6%
2021-22: 35.7%
2022-23: 66.2%
2023-24: 68.0%
2024-25: 64.5%
2025-26 (so far): 90.0%
2019 TOR: -4.0% lower winning percentage, -0.2 lower net rating in playoffs
Thunder won the title without playing its best ball, unlike countless champions throughout history.
Miami Heat: 109.8
Denver Nuggets: 109.8
San Antonio Spurs: 109.8
Detroit Pistons: 109.6
.
.
.
.
Oklahoma City Thunder: 104.8
Miami Heat: 109.8
Denver Nuggets: 109.8
San Antonio Spurs: 109.8
Detroit Pistons: 109.6
.
.
.
.
Oklahoma City Thunder: 104.8
OKC made 13 more twos (on four more attempts)
SAC made two more threes (on five more attempts)
OKC committed four fewer turnovers
OKC and SAC grabbed eight offensive rebounds
OKC made 11 more free throws (on nine more attempts)
OKC made 13 more twos (on four more attempts)
SAC made two more threes (on five more attempts)
OKC committed four fewer turnovers
OKC and SAC grabbed eight offensive rebounds
OKC made 11 more free throws (on nine more attempts)
OKC made six more 2-pointers (on eight more attempts)
POR made four more 3-pointers (on five more attempts)
OKC committed one fewer turnover
OKC grabbed two more offensive rebounds
POR made two more free throws (on one more attempt)
OKC made six more 2-pointers (on eight more attempts)
POR made four more 3-pointers (on five more attempts)
OKC committed one fewer turnover
OKC grabbed two more offensive rebounds
POR made two more free throws (on one more attempt)
OKC shooting within five feet: 162-for-234 (69.2%), No. 5 in NBA
OKC opponents’ shooting within five feet: 111-for-194 (57.2%), No. 4 in NBA
Thunder success comes from interior scoring/rim protection and the turnover battle – each sustainable nightly.
OKC shooting within five feet: 162-for-234 (69.2%), No. 5 in NBA
OKC opponents’ shooting within five feet: 111-for-194 (57.2%), No. 4 in NBA
Thunder success comes from interior scoring/rim protection and the turnover battle – each sustainable nightly.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander on the court: +68 point differential in 280.6 minutes (+0.24 per minute)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander on the bench: +38 point differential in 123.4 minutes (+0.31 per minute)
OKC’s depth has taken a massive step from last year.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander on the court: +68 point differential in 280.6 minutes (+0.24 per minute)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander on the bench: +38 point differential in 123.4 minutes (+0.31 per minute)
OKC’s depth has taken a massive step from last year.
OKC made 12 more twos (on 11 more attempts)
OKC made equal threes as LAC (on five fewer attempts)
OKC forced nine more turnovers
OKC grabbed two fewer offensive rebounds
OKC made five fewer free throws (on five fewer attempts)
OKC made 12 more twos (on 11 more attempts)
OKC made equal threes as LAC (on five fewer attempts)
OKC forced nine more turnovers
OKC grabbed two fewer offensive rebounds
OKC made five fewer free throws (on five fewer attempts)