Trouble is they seem to be trying to please everyone but end up pleasing no-one.

Immigration: left say it's too far, the right not far enough.
🇵🇸 recognition: left disgusted KS made it conditional, right reckoned wrong decision at wrong time.

A shrink is a psychiatrist.

& 🇮🇱 to a greater has changed that.

So all in all, yes, some solution wouldn't be such a bad idea.

line as to where their results should be if you were to exclude solidarity/diaspora voting.

Diaspora/neighbour voting has and always will be a thing at ESC, but most of the time it's more of a minor irritant than a real threat to the integrity of the contest. However, 🇺🇦 to a smaller extent...

For 🇮🇱 it's pretty simple, their songs are average at best, but a mass effort by bad actors inflated their televote results.

🇺🇦 is trickiet. For starters, it's organic and there's no foul play. Plus, their songs are generally pretty good. So in their case particularly, it's difficult to draw the...

GB News would never hold the seagulls to account like this!

Interesting thoughts. However, I'm rather more confident on the voting reform. From the little we have been told, seems the Ref Group looked at it in the summer, and the EBU's proposed changes were shared with delegations in September.

somewhat unrelated, but if we've submitted a question for the Editorial Q&A in the past, do we need to keep resubmitting it until it's answered, or does it stay in the system from the first time?

Oh no! Me and my cats send you hugs 🤗

I follow them on here as BBC haven't set up camp yet, and I've drastically cut down how much I use Twitter.

Yh, he's apparently going to sue in Florida, but even then he'll have a mountain to climb. The bar for defamation is higher in the US compared to the UK, thanks to their old friend the 1st Amendment. Plus, Panorama wasn't aired in the States, so the court wouldn't have jurisdiction over the matter.

The beginning reminds me of the Eurovision 2023 animation