I think this one makes the cut. It’s too bizarre not to mention and too tied into the other issues that the illegally appointed non-prosecutor flubbed this essential, simple step in her zeal to selectively prosecute

Maybe that note reflects the full GJ intent, maybe not. This is exactly the kind of retroactive GJ-intent-guessing that DC precedent counsels against. The better way to handle GJ matters is to require total clarity in the records so there's no doubt what happened

What's the evidence that the second two counts were true billed, though? The document was filled out and signed as if fully rejected, and then later in different pen *someone* added the note about just count 1.

But in this case there literally isn't an indictment. Not presenting it to the grand jury for a vote isn't a mere defect, it's the act that transforms a meaningless piece of paper into one with legal significance.

I want to reiterate that countless conservative judges issued universal injunctions against the Biden administration, and the Supreme Court never halted the practice. Now, barely five months into Trump's second term, the court puts an end to these injunctions. A brazen double standard.

Who is that guy to tell you what your name is, No Purch!

Did he want you to have purchasing authority?

Grievances 16-19 in Declaration of Independence
16. "For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world"
17. "For imposing taxes on us without our consent"
18. "For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Jury trial"
19. "For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences"