John from Baltimore
@employee41.bsky.social
Love this ad placement @politico.com
October 14, 2025 at 5:47 PM
Love this ad placement @politico.com
This director of the FBI? Director K$h?
October 5, 2025 at 5:07 AM
This director of the FBI? Director K$h?
September 20, 2025 at 4:09 PM
It's hard not to feel like no one cares if it's happening to Africans
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/15/w...
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/15/w...
September 15, 2025 at 4:34 AM
It's hard not to feel like no one cares if it's happening to Africans
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/15/w...
www.nytimes.com/2025/09/15/w...
This is not acceptable. This is Revolution-provoking bullshit.
September 8, 2025 at 4:20 PM
This is not acceptable. This is Revolution-provoking bullshit.
September 1, 2025 at 3:51 PM
Kilmar taken into ICE custody
August 25, 2025 at 12:34 PM
Kilmar taken into ICE custody
No, not true this time. If turnout was 100%, Trump would have won with a larger margin.
July 3, 2025 at 4:14 PM
No, not true this time. If turnout was 100%, Trump would have won with a larger margin.
Congrats to him on doubling his hero's numbers
July 3, 2025 at 3:36 AM
Congrats to him on doubling his hero's numbers
I'm very confused why they chose to make a misleading chart when a not-misleading chart makes the same point if you actually draw out the trendlines.
June 27, 2025 at 5:38 AM
I'm very confused why they chose to make a misleading chart when a not-misleading chart makes the same point if you actually draw out the trendlines.
What confuses me so much about this is if their point is "NY would have a higher minimum wage in 2030 than these other cities are trending toward" WHY make shitty graph with lies for axes when legit graph would make that same point
June 27, 2025 at 5:33 AM
What confuses me so much about this is if their point is "NY would have a higher minimum wage in 2030 than these other cities are trending toward" WHY make shitty graph with lies for axes when legit graph would make that same point
What I'm trying to figure out is why make misleading graph with weird axes when legit graph make same point?????
June 27, 2025 at 5:32 AM
What I'm trying to figure out is why make misleading graph with weird axes when legit graph make same point?????
Literally generated this seconds ago haha
June 13, 2025 at 4:00 AM
Literally generated this seconds ago haha
Maybe if you won't read you'll look at chart.
"success" is defined in the book it's attached to as "overthrowing the regime" fyi
"success" is defined in the book it's attached to as "overthrowing the regime" fyi
June 2, 2025 at 4:13 AM
Maybe if you won't read you'll look at chart.
"success" is defined in the book it's attached to as "overthrowing the regime" fyi
"success" is defined in the book it's attached to as "overthrowing the regime" fyi
Can someone please record a good Parker Posey impression for this?
April 24, 2025 at 1:32 PM
Can someone please record a good Parker Posey impression for this?
Ooo I know this one! I/O Psych classes.
Employers are actually already allowed to discriminate if it's the empirically most effective tool to determine job effectiveness. E.g. an upper body strength test disparately impacts women but is allowed for a firefighter.
Employers are actually already allowed to discriminate if it's the empirically most effective tool to determine job effectiveness. E.g. an upper body strength test disparately impacts women but is allowed for a firefighter.
April 24, 2025 at 4:27 AM
Ooo I know this one! I/O Psych classes.
Employers are actually already allowed to discriminate if it's the empirically most effective tool to determine job effectiveness. E.g. an upper body strength test disparately impacts women but is allowed for a firefighter.
Employers are actually already allowed to discriminate if it's the empirically most effective tool to determine job effectiveness. E.g. an upper body strength test disparately impacts women but is allowed for a firefighter.
I've listened to enough @lawfaremedia.org to think this actually has pretty profound implications for the Supreme Court and questions of US custody, right? @benjaminwittes.lawfaremedia.org et al?
From @thebaltimorebanner.com
From @thebaltimorebanner.com
April 16, 2025 at 8:58 PM
I've listened to enough @lawfaremedia.org to think this actually has pretty profound implications for the Supreme Court and questions of US custody, right? @benjaminwittes.lawfaremedia.org et al?
From @thebaltimorebanner.com
From @thebaltimorebanner.com
Looks like maybe 20,000 or so people?
March 22, 2025 at 1:24 PM
Looks like maybe 20,000 or so people?
#50501 no kings
March 4, 2025 at 5:51 PM
#50501 no kings
Meanwhile here's the assistant general counsel at ICE (Jim Rodden, confirmed by The Texas Observer)
February 23, 2025 at 6:29 AM
Meanwhile here's the assistant general counsel at ICE (Jim Rodden, confirmed by The Texas Observer)