You can still write a coherent and grammatical sentence, so you are *a lot* better at this than yours truly.
Nevertheless—Why torture yourself by trying?

Well done, but you underestimated an evil mind…

TR being the very little known, pilotless A5M2 drone version, obviously.

TL is a Lockheed Altair (autocorrect wants to make it Lockheed Affair, after the bribery scandal). The rest was correct, I think.

Were the traditionalist, conservative “Junker” (still a strong force on the officer corps) antisemitic? Their attitude under Nazi rule seems self-contradictory.

Much like the IJN in WW2, often accused of betting it all on some big battleship Götterdammerung, actually allowed itself to be completely out-built on battleships because nearly everything else was more critically important, and shipyard capacity limited.

I think the sticking point is that if you were building a well-balanced fleet including the cruisers, destroyers, carriers, submarines, oilers, etc., the battleships ended up being the most expensive items _and_ the ones you could most easily do without. Useful, but if you had to make a choice…

L’esprit de Saint Louis ;-)

Quick, before *someone* inserts something hideous.

An implausible survivor!

An interesting bit is that while Boulton-Paul would develop the French SAMM turret design and fit four .303 machine guns, the French themselves abandoned turrets in favour of a stowable mount for a 20-mm HS.404, as seen here. Certainly the more effective gun - maybe not the best mounting.

TL Naval Aircraft Factory TS-1
TR Aichi H9A1
BL Lübeck-Travemunde F.1
BR Focke-Wulf Fw 62

BL nearly gave me a sleepless night!

Have some respect for the dancer — as jobs go, this is a lot more dignified than being Trump’s Attorney General.

Obviously _this_ is the Albatros Mk.1 😲

TL Lockheed TO-1 (hints of NAVY on the fuselage)
TR Albatros D.I
BL Martin JM-1
BR Spitfire Mk.III
The last one, a unique prototype, is the odd one out.