Ellen Pero
@elperomyscus.bsky.social
Working/living with and for wild things, life and places.
Postdoc interested in species recovery and assessment. Posts about conservation, mushrooms, and occasional maths.
Wildlife MSc, PhD (she/her)
Postdoc interested in species recovery and assessment. Posts about conservation, mushrooms, and occasional maths.
Wildlife MSc, PhD (she/her)
Thanks much for this effort - would love an add 🙏🙏
July 18, 2025 at 3:00 AM
Thanks much for this effort - would love an add 🙏🙏
Specifically, modification of habitat can directly impact a species’ viability and should remain a part of the ESA’s definition of harm. We are in a period of unprecedented species extinction and need to safeguard our country’s resources -including biodiversity- for future generations.
April 22, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Specifically, modification of habitat can directly impact a species’ viability and should remain a part of the ESA’s definition of harm. We are in a period of unprecedented species extinction and need to safeguard our country’s resources -including biodiversity- for future generations.
Something as simple as: I strongly oppose the proposal to rescind the definition of “harm” as currently stated in the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
April 22, 2025 at 4:49 PM
Something as simple as: I strongly oppose the proposal to rescind the definition of “harm” as currently stated in the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Reposted by Ellen Pero
Colossal confirmed to me that they had some journalists sign NDAs.
The result is some compelling reporting—but without significant pushback from outside scientists. It's one thing for a journalist to ask 'well, are these really dire wolves?' and for an expert to assert 'THESE ARE NOT DIRE WOLVES'
The result is some compelling reporting—but without significant pushback from outside scientists. It's one thing for a journalist to ask 'well, are these really dire wolves?' and for an expert to assert 'THESE ARE NOT DIRE WOLVES'
April 11, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Colossal confirmed to me that they had some journalists sign NDAs.
The result is some compelling reporting—but without significant pushback from outside scientists. It's one thing for a journalist to ask 'well, are these really dire wolves?' and for an expert to assert 'THESE ARE NOT DIRE WOLVES'
The result is some compelling reporting—but without significant pushback from outside scientists. It's one thing for a journalist to ask 'well, are these really dire wolves?' and for an expert to assert 'THESE ARE NOT DIRE WOLVES'