Elisa Fadda
@elisafadda.bsky.social
Associate Professor in the School of Biological Sciences at the University of Southampton, head chef at https://GlycoShape.org, Salem's butler, fucose fanatic #glycotime everyday! She/Her
It's already there... I have to rename them all with underscores... Just ike a friendly psychopath 😂😂😂
November 12, 2025 at 8:54 PM
It's already there... I have to rename them all with underscores... Just ike a friendly psychopath 😂😂😂
😂😂 good job to pick up! Good to hear all is well at the top Library with the top cat!
November 12, 2025 at 8:01 PM
😂😂 good job to pick up! Good to hear all is well at the top Library with the top cat!
On the avg reviewer, I completely agree. The system is on its knees and tons of journals won't survive if without alternatives to human (lazy or not) reviewers. Imho this transition will further deepen the divide between CNS and others, but there is still eLife model, which makes me hope
November 11, 2025 at 9:29 AM
On the avg reviewer, I completely agree. The system is on its knees and tons of journals won't survive if without alternatives to human (lazy or not) reviewers. Imho this transition will further deepen the divide between CNS and others, but there is still eLife model, which makes me hope
Yes, I agree with you on the perception of endorsement, to which @richardsever.bsky.social replied the other day, (paraphrasing 'we also link to 300 Elsevier journals which we do not implicitly endorse submitting to'), but it is a point for sure 1/2
November 11, 2025 at 9:23 AM
Yes, I agree with you on the perception of endorsement, to which @richardsever.bsky.social replied the other day, (paraphrasing 'we also link to 300 Elsevier journals which we do not implicitly endorse submitting to'), but it is a point for sure 1/2
I think I can do my reviewing/writing, so I won't be using it, but do not think it is harmful within bioRxiv. Where it will be an issue is in journals, as a sub for peer review, and we are going there on a speed boat(!) inevitably as a consequence of the chaos that engulfs the publishing system 2/2
November 11, 2025 at 8:55 AM
I think I can do my reviewing/writing, so I won't be using it, but do not think it is harmful within bioRxiv. Where it will be an issue is in journals, as a sub for peer review, and we are going there on a speed boat(!) inevitably as a consequence of the chaos that engulfs the publishing system 2/2
I think you raise a good point, and imho, yes people should! The idea of putting an optional link to this tool in bioRxiv is to help authors who use or need these services to improve the structure of their manuscript. These authors who choose it, likely use AI to write the paper too... 1/2
November 11, 2025 at 8:48 AM
I think you raise a good point, and imho, yes people should! The idea of putting an optional link to this tool in bioRxiv is to help authors who use or need these services to improve the structure of their manuscript. These authors who choose it, likely use AI to write the paper too... 1/2