ElieNYC
@elienyc.bsky.social
Justice Correspondent for The Nation Magazine. Author of Allow Me to Retort and Bad Law.
Class: PLD. Alignment: Neutral Good
Str:12 Dex:8 Con:15 Int:13 Wis:10 Char:14 Author: Allow Me To Retort
Class: PLD. Alignment: Neutral Good
Str:12 Dex:8 Con:15 Int:13 Wis:10 Char:14 Author: Allow Me To Retort
Reposted by ElieNYC
This is the piece that is almost like an advertisement for your book. This is the definition of Bad Law, it's existence is indicative of a system that wants to reserve law to punish people that they don't like.
November 10, 2025 at 5:09 PM
This is the piece that is almost like an advertisement for your book. This is the definition of Bad Law, it's existence is indicative of a system that wants to reserve law to punish people that they don't like.
ALSO, the segment didn't mention how Felony Murder is disproportioniately sexist too. So, you know, excuse to read my chapter :)
www.amazon.com/Bad-Law-Popu...
www.amazon.com/Bad-Law-Popu...
Bad Law: Ten Popular Laws That Are Ruining America
Bad Law: Ten Popular Laws That Are Ruining America [Mystal, Elie] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Bad Law: Ten Popular Laws That Are Ruining America
www.amazon.com
November 10, 2025 at 5:06 PM
ALSO, the segment didn't mention how Felony Murder is disproportioniately sexist too. So, you know, excuse to read my chapter :)
www.amazon.com/Bad-Law-Popu...
www.amazon.com/Bad-Law-Popu...
It’s like that scene in Pirates where the British keep hanging pirates until they start singing, and he thinks it’s gonna help him but in the end his ship gets blown up while he’s having tea.
November 6, 2025 at 1:22 AM
It’s like that scene in Pirates where the British keep hanging pirates until they start singing, and he thinks it’s gonna help him but in the end his ship gets blown up while he’s having tea.
The Tappan Zee is doing just fine. :)
November 5, 2025 at 7:39 PM
The Tappan Zee is doing just fine. :)
No. I just thought that the bad justices weren’t convinced
November 5, 2025 at 6:16 PM
No. I just thought that the bad justices weren’t convinced
Reposted by ElieNYC
I’m definitely on the negative end of the spectrum here. Most of my peers think this was a bigger, clearer loss for Trump
November 5, 2025 at 6:08 PM
I’m definitely on the negative end of the spectrum here. Most of my peers think this was a bigger, clearer loss for Trump
I’m definitely on the negative end of the spectrum here. Most of my peers think this was a bigger, clearer loss for Trump
November 5, 2025 at 6:08 PM
I’m definitely on the negative end of the spectrum here. Most of my peers think this was a bigger, clearer loss for Trump
Reposted by ElieNYC
If I had to lock myself in, I’d say 6-3 against tariffs but with a clear way for Trump to try them again but he has to call them “license fees.”
But I’m not confident in that prediction because Roberts and ACB are squirrels
But I’m not confident in that prediction because Roberts and ACB are squirrels
November 5, 2025 at 6:00 PM
If I had to lock myself in, I’d say 6-3 against tariffs but with a clear way for Trump to try them again but he has to call them “license fees.”
But I’m not confident in that prediction because Roberts and ACB are squirrels
But I’m not confident in that prediction because Roberts and ACB are squirrels
If I had to lock myself in, I’d say 6-3 against tariffs but with a clear way for Trump to try them again but he has to call them “license fees.”
But I’m not confident in that prediction because Roberts and ACB are squirrels
But I’m not confident in that prediction because Roberts and ACB are squirrels
November 5, 2025 at 6:00 PM
If I had to lock myself in, I’d say 6-3 against tariffs but with a clear way for Trump to try them again but he has to call them “license fees.”
But I’m not confident in that prediction because Roberts and ACB are squirrels
But I’m not confident in that prediction because Roberts and ACB are squirrels