DJ Eddie
@electricshock25.bsky.social
you're right but Starmer, along with many some brexit commentators support the cherry picking approach.
they think they can leverage the EUs need for weaponisation as a means to deliver hannan's dream brexit.
only polanksi is calling for a referendum on triggering article 49.
they think they can leverage the EUs need for weaponisation as a means to deliver hannan's dream brexit.
only polanksi is calling for a referendum on triggering article 49.
January 5, 2026 at 1:01 PM
you're right but Starmer, along with many some brexit commentators support the cherry picking approach.
they think they can leverage the EUs need for weaponisation as a means to deliver hannan's dream brexit.
only polanksi is calling for a referendum on triggering article 49.
they think they can leverage the EUs need for weaponisation as a means to deliver hannan's dream brexit.
only polanksi is calling for a referendum on triggering article 49.
it's only useless to those who promote the silly notion of "brexitism".
Cultural & educational differences between East & West Germany came to the fore with the same anti-EU anti-Migrant populism the british faced.
the Germans didn't invent a word to paper over the cracks.
Cultural & educational differences between East & West Germany came to the fore with the same anti-EU anti-Migrant populism the british faced.
the Germans didn't invent a word to paper over the cracks.
December 16, 2025 at 12:36 PM
it's only useless to those who promote the silly notion of "brexitism".
Cultural & educational differences between East & West Germany came to the fore with the same anti-EU anti-Migrant populism the british faced.
the Germans didn't invent a word to paper over the cracks.
Cultural & educational differences between East & West Germany came to the fore with the same anti-EU anti-Migrant populism the british faced.
the Germans didn't invent a word to paper over the cracks.
But what's that got to do with "european identity"?
I don't buy into that nonsense. nor the idea people voted for labour because their pro brexit slant. It was because of #GTTO. The current polls reflect that, with labour 4th, not 1st.
I don't buy into that nonsense. nor the idea people voted for labour because their pro brexit slant. It was because of #GTTO. The current polls reflect that, with labour 4th, not 1st.
December 16, 2025 at 10:04 AM
But what's that got to do with "european identity"?
I don't buy into that nonsense. nor the idea people voted for labour because their pro brexit slant. It was because of #GTTO. The current polls reflect that, with labour 4th, not 1st.
I don't buy into that nonsense. nor the idea people voted for labour because their pro brexit slant. It was because of #GTTO. The current polls reflect that, with labour 4th, not 1st.
that's not true. people voted to get the tories out (#GTTO) in 2024. Starmer made his "no to CU, SM and EU in my lifetime" speech 24 hours before the GE vote.
Are those the same MEPs who accepted russian rubles, like ex MEP Nathan Gill?
Are those the same MEPs who accepted russian rubles, like ex MEP Nathan Gill?
December 16, 2025 at 9:49 AM
that's not true. people voted to get the tories out (#GTTO) in 2024. Starmer made his "no to CU, SM and EU in my lifetime" speech 24 hours before the GE vote.
Are those the same MEPs who accepted russian rubles, like ex MEP Nathan Gill?
Are those the same MEPs who accepted russian rubles, like ex MEP Nathan Gill?
it's like an online witch hunt. I'm struggling to disagree with his main point.
Why is this "brexitism" not in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Gibraltar? they all voted remain in 2016.
Why is this "brexitism" not in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Gibraltar? they all voted remain in 2016.
December 16, 2025 at 9:45 AM
it's like an online witch hunt. I'm struggling to disagree with his main point.
Why is this "brexitism" not in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Gibraltar? they all voted remain in 2016.
Why is this "brexitism" not in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Gibraltar? they all voted remain in 2016.
This is really weird. I cannot disagree with anything he has said. He's 100% correct.
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None.
What brexit benefits will you miss if the UK rejoins EU?
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None.
What brexit benefits will you miss if the UK rejoins EU?
December 15, 2025 at 12:19 PM
This is really weird. I cannot disagree with anything he has said. He's 100% correct.
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None.
What brexit benefits will you miss if the UK rejoins EU?
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None.
What brexit benefits will you miss if the UK rejoins EU?
I cannot disagree with anything he has said.
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None. Nada. Niente.
What, specifically, do you believe is good keeping from brexit?
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None. Nada. Niente.
What, specifically, do you believe is good keeping from brexit?
December 15, 2025 at 12:17 PM
I cannot disagree with anything he has said.
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None. Nada. Niente.
What, specifically, do you believe is good keeping from brexit?
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None. Nada. Niente.
What, specifically, do you believe is good keeping from brexit?
I think what annoys Niall so much is he's correct.
At least, I cannot disagree with any of his actual points. there is no redeemable benefits or value to brexit. it is, as he puts it, bonkers to suggest there is.
At least, I cannot disagree with any of his actual points. there is no redeemable benefits or value to brexit. it is, as he puts it, bonkers to suggest there is.
December 15, 2025 at 12:16 PM
I think what annoys Niall so much is he's correct.
At least, I cannot disagree with any of his actual points. there is no redeemable benefits or value to brexit. it is, as he puts it, bonkers to suggest there is.
At least, I cannot disagree with any of his actual points. there is no redeemable benefits or value to brexit. it is, as he puts it, bonkers to suggest there is.
I cannot disagree with anything he has said.
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None. Nada. Niente.
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None. Nada. Niente.
December 15, 2025 at 12:15 PM
I cannot disagree with anything he has said.
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None. Nada. Niente.
there is no other fix for brexit other than article 49. everything else is, like he says, bonkers. There is no redeemable value to brexit. None. Nada. Niente.