KarlPurcellBehavEcon
banner
ef110econ.bsky.social
KarlPurcellBehavEcon
@ef110econ.bsky.social
Applying behavioural science to help make people happier, healthier, and wealthier with @irrationallabs. All views are personal. Retweets are not endorsements.
Reposted by KarlPurcellBehavEcon
This is all p misleading IMO. I just saw this link so haven't read it yet (but will, though I also think lots of the retweets of this haven't read it as well, given its provenance). I don't see how this counters (eg) Dawson 1999 which goes through 13 millennial cults and finds 12 show the effect 1/n
November 6, 2025 at 2:37 PM
Reposted by KarlPurcellBehavEcon
You can update the target parameters yourself!

ifp.org/how-much-sho...
October 31, 2025 at 8:04 PM
Just make sense.
September 5, 2025 at 10:25 PM
More digital stuff gets built. So abundance is the right approach because it says let's make lots more stuff, specifically the stuff that we need that was made hard by laws/regulation/death by committee etc? I think there's more to it than this but think abundance agenda for things like housing
September 5, 2025 at 10:25 PM
Couldn't you argue that the real cause is the bureaucracy, the self interest of existing homeowners and to some degree the risk aversion, and thats precisely so many digital things were but we didn't necessarily want/need? Capital wants to go somewhere. When building physical things is way harder..
September 5, 2025 at 10:25 PM