Reposted by Eevea
"Harvard can't use race as a factor in admissions, but ICE can use race as a factor in detentions" is a retrenchment essentially to a pre-Civil War understanding of the Constitution. It's vanishingly few steps removed from "Latinos have no rights which the white man is bound to respect."
September 9, 2025 at 4:44 PM
"Harvard can't use race as a factor in admissions, but ICE can use race as a factor in detentions" is a retrenchment essentially to a pre-Civil War understanding of the Constitution. It's vanishingly few steps removed from "Latinos have no rights which the white man is bound to respect."
Reposted by Eevea
It's just a sports ban.
It's just a bathroom ban.
It's just a healthcare for kids ban.
It's just a military service ban.
It's just a federal jobs ban.
It's just a university housing ban.
It's just a passport & visa ban.
It's just one Constitutional right.
It's just your status as free citizens.
It's just a bathroom ban.
It's just a healthcare for kids ban.
It's just a military service ban.
It's just a federal jobs ban.
It's just a university housing ban.
It's just a passport & visa ban.
It's just one Constitutional right.
It's just your status as free citizens.
September 5, 2025 at 12:34 AM
It's just a sports ban.
It's just a bathroom ban.
It's just a healthcare for kids ban.
It's just a military service ban.
It's just a federal jobs ban.
It's just a university housing ban.
It's just a passport & visa ban.
It's just one Constitutional right.
It's just your status as free citizens.
It's just a bathroom ban.
It's just a healthcare for kids ban.
It's just a military service ban.
It's just a federal jobs ban.
It's just a university housing ban.
It's just a passport & visa ban.
It's just one Constitutional right.
It's just your status as free citizens.
Reposted by Eevea
I see the misinformation machine is kicking up to support Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Israel amendment.
Advocates have a responsibility to be clear about what legislation does and doesn’t do. Her amendment did NOT cut off offensive aid to Israel. We shouldn’t pretend it does.
My statement on it:
Advocates have a responsibility to be clear about what legislation does and doesn’t do. Her amendment did NOT cut off offensive aid to Israel. We shouldn’t pretend it does.
My statement on it:
July 19, 2025 at 3:16 PM
I see the misinformation machine is kicking up to support Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Israel amendment.
Advocates have a responsibility to be clear about what legislation does and doesn’t do. Her amendment did NOT cut off offensive aid to Israel. We shouldn’t pretend it does.
My statement on it:
Advocates have a responsibility to be clear about what legislation does and doesn’t do. Her amendment did NOT cut off offensive aid to Israel. We shouldn’t pretend it does.
My statement on it:
Reposted by Eevea
Puerto Rico has just banned gender affirming care for trans people up to age 21. It is now the ban with the highest age limit in the United States.
www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...
www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...
Puerto Rico bans hormone therapy and gender surgery for trans people under 21
The law calls for 15 years in prison for any violators, as well as a $50,000 penalty and the revocation of all licenses and permits of medical staff.
www.nbcnews.com
July 17, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Puerto Rico has just banned gender affirming care for trans people up to age 21. It is now the ban with the highest age limit in the United States.
www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...
www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-...
Reposted by Eevea
Whenever people note the way Gaza just dropped off everyone's TL the day after the election, defenders of the discourse pop up to say "actually, you just need to follow the right people".
I call this the New York Times defense. "We wrote an article about this important thing once, it was on A26."
I call this the New York Times defense. "We wrote an article about this important thing once, it was on A26."
July 15, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Whenever people note the way Gaza just dropped off everyone's TL the day after the election, defenders of the discourse pop up to say "actually, you just need to follow the right people".
I call this the New York Times defense. "We wrote an article about this important thing once, it was on A26."
I call this the New York Times defense. "We wrote an article about this important thing once, it was on A26."
Reposted by Eevea
Cynical lefties are just as bad as right-leaning trolls. They add nothing to the conversation and are just noise.
Stay off my timeline with that garbage. If you can't see based on [waves arms] everything Trump is doing that Harris would have been objectively better; you can fuck off.
Stay off my timeline with that garbage. If you can't see based on [waves arms] everything Trump is doing that Harris would have been objectively better; you can fuck off.
July 12, 2025 at 9:11 PM
Cynical lefties are just as bad as right-leaning trolls. They add nothing to the conversation and are just noise.
Stay off my timeline with that garbage. If you can't see based on [waves arms] everything Trump is doing that Harris would have been objectively better; you can fuck off.
Stay off my timeline with that garbage. If you can't see based on [waves arms] everything Trump is doing that Harris would have been objectively better; you can fuck off.
This is what Trump is saying now. Impotent privileged single issue non-voters will tell you that this is actually not that bad because Harris would have wanted to create a racial and political ethno United States too. And they’ll actually believe it.
July 12, 2025 at 10:18 PM
This is what Trump is saying now. Impotent privileged single issue non-voters will tell you that this is actually not that bad because Harris would have wanted to create a racial and political ethno United States too. And they’ll actually believe it.