I don't think the biggest problem is that this relief exists. The total allowance is 60k. That's just mad.

You can also park 20k in your ISA, 9k in JISA per kids, 2.8k in JSIPP per kid.
A family of 4 can shelter just over 183k per year from tax.

You can’t buy paracetamol in those quantities because of the suicide risk. Given the OP, though, worrying about paracetamol jar sizes is moot in the U.S.

There speak a man with employer-provided healthcare.

The better deal goes to school in Canada. You wouldn’t know her.

He’s retiring though, right?

There are 8 onboard apparently?

If you are a federal employees who’s gone a month without pay and the Dems cave now with nothing to show for it, sure you’re being paid again, but then you ask, what was all that pain for?

It’s the Keir Starmer politics of pissing off everyone.

The average first-time buyer is now in their forties and not twenties, the % of seniors still paying off their mortgage has jumped from 15% to 25% etc. etc.

The average mortgaged homeowner spends 21% of household income on their mortgage, more or less unchanged from 1980 (but you don’t see this in CPI-U since it substitutes nominal market rent for actual mortgage payments for homeowners.)

www.jchs.harvard.edu/research-are...

A cap of €35k in eligible costs of successful JRs.

archive.is/zdPEb

Which is why Schumer is folding.

Cost burden is an extremely good metric to explain why people feel like their disposable income levels have fallen compared to previous generations.

The number of cost-burdened households (“within the bins”) has increased in the same timeframe from
15mn to 23 million households.

And yet the share of renting households who are cost burdened has risen by 25% since the turn of the century, most acutely for low-income households.

Or it’s just a reaction to the Axios piece.

Now do after housing costs.

Now do after housing costs.

Mike Johnson?