What's grim about this really is not what she's saying, which is at least vaguely attempting to couch it in 'not that this is necessarily bad' terms, but that this story exists entirely to get people to assume she's being racist and either get angry or agree with her.

this is just what The Data wants unfortunately.

They actually brought him back as a big dog thing at his own request as part of his right of reply.

People love being basic

this was actually woke

who is also in the first atlas shrugged movie lol

they should appoint chatGPT

Maybe, but there certainly have been instances of people assuming that and merrily burning through vast amounts of credits and getting a shock!

The bit of "Objector"'s website that explains they get around hallucinations by asking 2 different bots about planning laws is very funny.

(and in terms of size)

Unless it's a fucking old TV it will not be an issue in terms of weight

I mean in terms of a commercial offering I do wonder if this is any more effective at doing so than just asking ChatGPT for free?

My question is how much the free part of their services cost them in API credits because the funniest outcome is definitely the founders losing everything to pay off their open AI bill or whatever.

Or at least it doesn't really dwell on that. I guess fair to say that AI is probably already helping to jam things up with nonsense.

Worth watching with the sound too

what you should have done is something else

or Google Glasses