Eric Dasmalchi
banner
edasmalchi.bsky.social
Eric Dasmalchi
@edasmalchi.bsky.social
Transportation data, island dweller, hiked far once, Roomba enthusiast. 湯の中で泳ぐべからず。Opinions here and on treasuredtidings.net are mine alone.
That’s one-time, not annual right? Can I pay in installments? 🙂

But yeah I’m entirely onboard with the goal of slower cities.
October 23, 2025 at 1:40 PM
True, I don’t think it’s a fundamental truth or anything. I’m working personally and professionally to justify narrower roads, less parking, and more transit. But it’s taking a while to get there and I think that some would otherwise choose a car for now, with worse externalities.
October 23, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Definitely not an example of a place to go 28mph, but perhaps 10-15 is safe through here vs. walking pace when you couldn't see around the corner...
October 23, 2025 at 2:01 AM
I'm torn on this one, would be an easier call if we had Europe's land use and infrastructure. Those things are slow to change, and I've found my Class 3 to be a useful band-aid for longer trips (much of VMT) and fast car traffic. I like to think I know when to slow down depending on context.
October 23, 2025 at 1:52 AM
makes me more likely to shop there via ebike across the bridge!
October 21, 2025 at 8:15 PM
I'm starting to see larger overhead bins roll out that can theoretically fit a roller bag for each person... if used per directions.
October 17, 2025 at 8:57 PM
Linked upthread (High Quality Transit Stops vs High Quality Transit Areas)
October 14, 2025 at 7:59 PM
It's not in our buffered version (High Quality Transit Areas) though, I think since hq corridors aren't buffered from particular stops but I could add it there for major stops if helpful gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/863...?
High Quality Transit Areas
Estimated High Quality Transit Areas as described in Public Resources Code 21155, 21064.3, 21060.2. High Quality Transit Corridors are buffered a half-mile from the linear General Transit Feed Specifi...
gis.data.ca.gov
October 14, 2025 at 6:56 PM
Should be present for existing stops as stop_id?
October 14, 2025 at 6:52 PM
We could potentially expand our RTP stop schema to ask for RTIP inclusion github.com/cal-itp/data...
github.com
October 14, 2025 at 4:05 PM
I think it's unlikely, and could risk confusing folks if that combined map goes out of sync with the MPO maps. Our plan so far is to expand our current approach to include some useful attributes for SB 79, enabling MPOs and others to use our map to help compile theirs.
October 14, 2025 at 4:04 PM
Update is live! gis.data.ca.gov/datasets/f6c...

Overall looks good but sadly now missing Foothill Transit - looked and it doesn't seem like we've downloaded their GTFS since August. Flagged it to the relevant team, hopefully an easy fix. Otherwise I can patch in old data with our Oct update in 1wk
High Quality Transit Stops
Estimated stops along High Quality Transit Corridors, plus major transit stops for bus rapid transit, ferry, rail modes as described in Public Resources Code 21155, 21064.3, 21060.2. Existing stops ar...
gis.data.ca.gov
October 13, 2025 at 10:26 PM